Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wow.... It's interesting. It's messing with my eyes. What did you do?
Do? Now you're messing with MY head! is there something about this vista that you can't grasp? :gah:
Very cool :thumbup: it does kind of mess with my eyes to, it looks HDRish.
It's lovely! I can see it's a HD but I swear it feels like you did something else...
Hold on let me take a closer look
Very cool :thumbup: it does kind of mess with my eyes to, it looks HDRish.
Thank you!
It's lovely! I can see it's a HD but I swear it feels like you did something else...
Hold on let me take a closer look
Thank you!
PS This is a single image, not multi-shot HDR.
KenL;1913685 So is it a single-shot HDR then? AKA tone mapped? People throw around "HDR" for everything.[/quote said:This was tonemapped. As you say, "HDR" is thrown around a lot....
HDR requires at least two images, usually with a different exposure for each. With Photoshop, and all other programs, we use a host of features to process our images. So, the notion that "tonemapping" is somehow different than using curves, levels, contrast, brightness, saturation, hue, layers, sharpening, etcetera, is amusing. There are some folks that think any processing of an image is wrong!
Many people have commented to me that they could use the "good-old standard processing features" without doing HDR and get the same effect. Same for tonemapping. That is probably true. After all, didn't people work "magic" in the darkroom before digital? Didn't painters use brushes before there were rollers, or sprayers?
I love the colors, its absolutely amazing!
Thank you Fraginator!
Personally, I don't care for the tone mapping here. It just looks too "fake" and I think you loose sense of the depth of field (not technical DOF, but how far back the stuff extends). Don't know if this makes sense, but it just seems as though everything is "there" right in front of you.
Personally, I don't care for the tone mapping here. It just looks too "fake" and I think you loose sense of the depth of field (not technical DOF, but how far back the stuff extends). Don't know if this makes sense, but it just seems as though everything is "there" right in front of you.
You are entitled to your opinion, and my opinion
of your opinion is that your opinion is worthless. :violin:
Personally, I don't care for the tone mapping here. It just looks too "fake" and I think you loose sense of the depth of field (not technical DOF, but how far back the stuff extends). Don't know if this makes sense, but it just seems as though everything is "there" right in front of you.
You are entitled to your opinion, and my opinion
of your opinion is that your opinion is worthless. :violin:
The nature of this forum is to get feedback on photographs. Having purely positive or purely negative feedback is never help to anyone. I gave you feedback based on my opinion of the technique you employed because I thought it would be helpful to you in the future. But thank you for your lovely reply; I have never used the "ignore" feature on this forum, but you have given me an impetus to search it out.