Let's get this straight. I was Officially sponsored by Canon France..I was a loyal Canon user for almost 20 years. I changed to Pentax at my own volition and did so because the K10D was that good. I would not have given up my platform unless Pentax could perform. That would be professional suicide. I can use any platform I please. I am not compelled to use a platform. If it doesn't do what I need that tool to do and deliver the goods I would drop it like a hot potatoe. It is simple as that...
You may very well have changed brand of your own volition - i wasn't arguing otherwise.
I was pointing out, as someone else now has, that your posts are, in the main about how good your equipment is. It's great you feel that way but why must you keep posting it?
Claiming that Pentax couldn't afford your alleged fee of 1200Euros per day is a bit childish. I'm fairly sure they could but whether they felt it would be money well spent is another.
Boasting about a sum of money you can earn merely reinforces my first post - it's as if you're showing off or boasting because you work for numerous mags and are sponsored by a major camera company.
In reality i'd imagine most members here aren't interested in which mags publish your work but are interested in how you achieve certain effects. Your photos are excellent but continually reminding everyone about your "excellent" camera (which is no more than what an advance amatuer might own) gets boring and puts people off.
I'd also imagine that most members are more interested in how you got that particular look or that lighting effect rather than which camera you use.
To be honest, i feel as though your posts come across as almost condescending and that you feel that you're doing all of us amatuers a huge favour by occasionally popping in to offer some titbits of advice.
If you stuck more to posting about your technique and methods, rather than who you work for or where you're published, i think people would really enjoy reading your posts.