What's new

Am I the only one????

One thing I cannot stand about not having additional strobe lighting is the loss off control over ambient light.

Having complete control over ambient light, without effecting the lighting on your subject, is awesome.
 
Poorly done flash looks horrible. Well-done flash... liberates and enhances. Really - it's about the light. Small sources cast harsh shadows, contribute to glare, create strong contrast. Large sources create smooth shadows, even out texture, make nice transitions. Flash in the hands of an experienced photographer is like painting with light - a bit of highlight here, some softening of shadows there, some graduated backbround, some nice rim lighting...


photography literally translates to PAINTING WITH LIGHT.
 
So glad you posted this... I hate the flash...... I just today bought a speedlight and I'm im love with it...
 
I flashed this. Does it look bad?
p1256737722-4.jpg
y Nice


Ver
 
I feel like I am the only person who absolutely cannot stand pictures using a flash! I feel like I'm the only person who absolutely refuses to use a flash unless Ive exhausted my other options and absolutely cannot get a photo without one. Just wondering...

Sounds like someone doesn't know how to use off camera flash.

Good luck getting shot like this with natural lighting.


Untitled by NOLA_2T, on Flickr


Untitled by NOLA_2T, on Flickr
 
I prefer natural lighting...but have a speedlight and it has changed my perspective. Now I want to learn how to use it and I feel overwhelmed by all it can do. I have the 430EXII and it is a great flash, although I wish I had the 530 instead, since the 430 can be slave only. Anyway, I definitely prefer the natural lighting but I tell everyone to try a speedlight before writing off flash all together.
 
I prefer natural light, but would be very limited in my jobs, I am a wedding photographer, without mastering the flash. I think everyone should be prepared to use a speed light off camera during a paid gig if they really had to.
 
I am with you. Lots if ppl dont know how to use it right and it looks awful. I 99% work with natural light. If its too dark I use a bouncy flash.
 
For those that agree with OP, can you post some examples of what you dislike about flash? (Remember to link, not post shot directly - Forum Rules)


I'm trying to find out if ya'll dislike wrongly used flash or flash in general, big difference.
 
For those that agree with OP, can you post some examples of what you dislike about flash? (Remember to link, not post shot directly - Forum Rules)


I'm trying to find out if ya'll dislike wrongly used flash or flash in general, big difference.

No one who understands flash and how to use it properly really dislikes it in the manner that you're suggesting. Some photographers may choose to go out of their way to use natural light instead, but that's a very different thing.

Ok, I'm sure there are examples of people who don't like it... but there are people who hate touch tone phones and horseless carriages, too.
 
Pictures like this one made me swear I'd never use flash again. Then I learned HOW to use flash. Still learning, but I haven't produced one of these (except on my iPhone) in a very long time. (It's my photo, just old.)

 
Why learning good flash technique helps you become a better natural-light photographer: Using "natural light" is about finding it - the hunter-gatherer approach. If it happens just right, then you feast, photographically speaking. If it's not right, you either use less than ideal light, or you look for better light or you wait.

With flash, you can grow your own light. You can add just a little, to supplement the natural light you've found and gathered, or you can completely replace it, or make light where the natural light don't shine. As in the invention of farming, which make the food source more regular and more consistent, learning to use flash gives you options that you otherwise just would not have had.

But to use flash effectively, you need to understand it - how to make a harsh (small) light softer, how to direct the light only where you need it, how to use the light fall-off creatively, how to block stray light (weeds, if you will) so that they don't contaminate your image, how to balance one, two or more light sources, and so on. This knowledge is generally much more advanced than what you get when you only shoot with natural light, and it opens up possibilities with natural light that you would not have even thought about. That large expanse of blue sky - giant soft box. Noon-day sun? a hard, bright single-source. Sunlight reflecting from a wall - large reflector. Now that you understand flash, you also understand how to use the different light sources, how to recognize them, and how to use them. You understand what the shadows are telling you about the light. You understand better, why some light is not good, and some is just heavenly.

So if you want to be a superb natural light photographer, learn to use flash effectively and well. It will open up "natural light" opportunities, even if you don't use flash in an image. But chances, are, you'll now always be able to see where additional light will improve the image, whether it is done by flash, by reflectors, by diffusers, or other means.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom