Best era of Playboy

[wyogirl]

When I was 11, we found my mate's dad's porn mag collection.
Seen one - seem 'em all when it comes to porn stuff.
Of course, I may have taken the odd private shot of girlfriends over time but I'm not really into porn as such, more reminders of past encounters.
Before I got married, I dumped the lot so I have a zero porn collection and no intention of restarting in any way.

I'm not really into in 'art' (is porn art?) photography so I don't see me trying to get into that field.
Being married means I'd probably lose my googlies if my wife found out I'd taken any such shots so that's out anyway.

So what you are saying is that you do not like naked images of women?

No implication just curious.

I'm sorry, are the images naked or are the women?? Sorry, I couldn't resist the grammar lesson.

 

[runnah]

I'm sorry, are the images naked or are the women?? Sorry, I couldn't resist the grammar lesson.

Your a nerd.

 

[wyogirl]

I'm sorry, are the images naked or are the women?? Sorry, I couldn't resist the grammar lesson.

Your a nerd.

Just a little.... but I'm also a straight female who had nothing else to contribute to this thread... next time I'll just be quiet.

 

[manaheim]

:addpics:

 

[Mike_E]

I read it for the articles.

After I had memorized the photos of course!

Back in the day Playboy was the highest paying mag out there, and they had some of the very best working for them. There was a reason that the photography was magnificent beyond the gorgeous women.

 

[nickzou]

Eh, I guess Playboy was treated with as much respect as it is today. Seems odd that it is only considered a nudie mag when out of some 200 pages, only 10 or so featured naked women while the rest of it was covering stuff like Watergate, Women's Liberation, and the Vietnam War.

LOL - Yeah, sure. You only read the articles.

No, I was surprised that Playboy even had articles. I didn't buy them growing up and I sure as hell didn't pick them up after I had the means, there was the internet at that point. So yes, I noticed Playboy not only had articles, but quality articles.

 

[manaheim]

I read it for the articles.

After I had memorized the photos of course!

Back in the day Playboy was the highest paying mag out there, and they had some of the very best working for them. There was a reason that the photography was magnificent beyond the gorgeous women.

I've heard this a lot from countless sources of varying degrees of qualification... I've still only ever looked at the boobies.

 

[Indofred]

When I was 11, we found my mate's dad's porn mag collection.
Seen one - seem 'em all when it comes to porn stuff.
Of course, I may have taken the odd private shot of girlfriends over time but I'm not really into porn as such, more reminders of past encounters.
Before I got married, I dumped the lot so I have a zero porn collection and no intention of restarting in any way.

I'm not really into in 'art' (is porn art?) photography so I don't see me trying to get into that field.
Being married means I'd probably lose my googlies if my wife found out I'd taken any such shots so that's out anyway.

...just because your on a diet,doesn't mean you can't look at the menu :lmao:

Not really interested in things on paper - Now, if you're talking about an eyeful of the real thing ..... maybe I'd have a quick glance; by accident of course.

 

[Indofred]

When I was 11, we found my mate's dad's porn mag collection.
Seen one - seem 'em all when it comes to porn stuff.
Of course, I may have taken the odd private shot of girlfriends over time but I'm not really into porn as such, more reminders of past encounters.
Before I got married, I dumped the lot so I have a zero porn collection and no intention of restarting in any way.

I'm not really into in 'art' (is porn art?) photography so I don't see me trying to get into that field.
Being married means I'd probably lose my googlies if my wife found out I'd taken any such shots so that's out anyway.

So what you are saying is that you do not like naked images of women?

No implication just curious.

I'm not especially bothered, no.
When I was 11, I felt like the next 9 birthdays had come at once but I grew up quickly.
I, being a very naughty young chap, had seen a real full set by 12 (a "you can look at mine" job)
I honestly lost interest in porn very quickly although I did go to a do just before my 18th birthday.
They had porn movies with a twist - I really thought that bloke was going to give the lady a seeing to but...well...that poor pig.
The one with the nuns was also very imaginative.

In general, I haven't deliberately looked at any porn since then as it's all pretty much the same.

Now, before you get the idea, I'm more of a man's man - don't.
There's no finer sight than a pretty lady and I have no interest at all in anything involving a sausage; maybe if a nun was involved and they moved on to carrots and a washing machine on fast spin.

As for porn shoots.
I'm not really into anything except street photos so I don't suppose I'll ever bother trying to do that sort of work. Illegal here anyway.
Of course, when I'm old and disgusting but too knackered to manage the real thing - I may return to paper or electronic filth.
I wonder if yo can get the right camera angles from a wheelchair.

 

[bribrius]

When I was 11, we found my mate's dad's porn mag collection.
Seen one - seem 'em all when it comes to porn stuff.
Of course, I may have taken the odd private shot of girlfriends over time but I'm not really into porn as such, more reminders of past encounters.
Before I got married, I dumped the lot so I have a zero porn collection and no intention of restarting in any way.

I'm not really into in 'art' (is porn art?) photography so I don't see me trying to get into that field.
Being married means I'd probably lose my googlies if my wife found out I'd taken any such shots so that's out anyway.

I haven't taken a nude picture of a woman since I met my wife. I have a feeling it wouldn't go over well....

 

[ffarl]

Ahhh, the good old days. I do miss the days when running into a pic of a naked women (or even partially so) was a special event. Now it's everywhere. Not special. I can see whatever I want, whenever I want, so I pretty much don't want to.

Used to be one of your buddies would steal a mag from their dad or older brother and those images had to last you six months. Magazine monogamy... at least temporarily.

 

[deveaushawn]

Your a nerd.

*You're

 

[minicoop1985]

I actually read it for the articles when I was younger. Took me about 10 or so minutes before I could read them, but they were actually pretty good. I think. Were they good? Sorry, boobs.