Village Idiot
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 7,269
- Reaction score
- 406
- Location
- Shepherdsturd, WV / Almost, MD
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
The 5D MKII is better.
I have the Canon 5d Mark II. I believe it to be superior to the 7d for what I do, which is wedding photography. However, I'm looking to buy a 7d to start shooting sports. The 5d Mark II is extremely slow in my opinion and is not very good for sports.
For those who have used the 7d, my questions involves a review I read from Ken Rockwell. He states the biggest flaw of the 7d is that when the autofocus points generates the black circles/ovals (not sure which, I have never used it) the points do not disappear even after you have established focus and are ready to shoot. He claims that because the points do not disappear it is a distraction to his composition. He even claims that he sometimes can't even tell what his subjects expression is after he is focusing because he can't see them? I'm guessing this is a bit of an exaggeration. But, I was wanting to know the thoughts of those who own the camera and what you think of this.
By the way, this thread is a bit crazy. It doesn't really matter what camera is better. Today, cameras are so much better than what they were yesterday. In general, there are MUCH more important things to consider when you are trying to improve your photographs. Lenses are 1000% more important than cameras. Lighting is 1000% more important than cameras. Before you have what you need in those categories stick to your old nikon or canon before upgrading. I'm pretty sure I can still make some great images even with an older 20D, but I could not without my 24-70 f/2.8L Of course, this is just my opinion.
Tyler
http://www.kvtphoto.com]Wedding and Portrait Photography[/url]
So Nikon D5100 arrives, what about this one?
I just bought the D7000 about three weeks ago.