What's new

Canon or Nikon?

well assuming people dont use Sony as a pro alternative, rule of thumb is, white = canon. ss for the blacks, you make a good point but at that level where most items are sponsored or company owned, it would surprise me if they aren't Nikon but you make a valid point nonetheless.
 
:crickets:

Um, "all" those photographers in that picture are not using Nikon. I didn't count, but looks close to half are L and the rest are black. Of the black ones, how many can you identify as Nikon, because Canon and other mfgs make black lenses, too. :lmao:

Anyone?

I can't tell. rpm can't tell.

Bueller? Bueller?
 
:crickets:

Um, "all" those photographers in that picture are not using Nikon. I didn't count, but looks close to half are L and the rest are black. Of the black ones, how many can you identify as Nikon, because Canon and other mfgs make black lenses, too. :lmao:

Anyone?

I can't tell. rpm can't tell.

Bueller? Bueller?

In the late 90s the Columbus Dispatch dumped their Nikon gear and bought $100K worth of Canon stuff.

Disclaimer: I own manual focus Leicaflex cameras and lenses and have no bias between Nikon and Canon.
 
Last edited:
:crickets:

Um, "all" those photographers in that picture are not using Nikon. I didn't count, but looks close to half are L and the rest are black. Of the black ones, how many can you identify as Nikon, because Canon and other mfgs make black lenses, too. :lmao:

Anyone?

I can't tell. rpm can't tell.

Bueller? Bueller?

Are u guys serious? We going to start this again.
 
Note that during the olympics the d3 had only been release for about 6month. You guys can bring up history all you want. I already said that pre D3 era, Canon was dominating. But we are talking about now here. Which quite frankly, you know nothing about. Do some research of what's going on today and stop holding on to the past.
 
To sum this thread up:

Poster 1: Canon is better!
Poster 2: No, Nikon all the way!
Poster 1: That's not what your mom said last night!
Poster 3: What did you say about my mom? No, YOU!
Poster 4: Do any of you have proof to support your conclusions?
Poster 1 and 2: Get outta here, nobody likes Pentax anyway!
Poster 3: Your mom is ugly.

This thread still goes on.
 
Do none of you have lives? :)

Here you go Neil, as you couldn't find your copy. (unless I missed your post)

deadhorse.gif

This

^^^
 
Nikon also make white lenses. Only on the big stuff and you have to ask for it.

---------------
Wedding Photographer Newcastle

i personally have never seen this or even heard of this..

and wast the light grey more due to the film cameras having a grey body and the lens were made to match? otherwise any recent Nikon lenses have been black and only back from what ive seen.
 
otherwise any recent Nikon lenses have been black and only back from what ive seen.
Just an example.

NIKON AF-S NIKKOR ED 80-200mm f/2.8D Light grey Exc+ - eBay (item 160452328979 end time Aug-03-10 22:00:48 PDT)

i retract my comment. but imo i feel that it looks really odd to see a nikon lens in anything but black. i understand in many aspects for canon its a good marketing scheme to have them in white but it just feels alien to see a nikon in anything other than black. maybe a very dark grey would be ok but anything bordering on white feels iffy...
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
And since Nikon was so perfect, why did thousands of press photographers switch?

The Columbus Dispatch dumped all their Nikon gear and went to Canon some time in the 90s. I was there when they were doing the transaction. I am sure they were not alone.

I happen to work for the Columbus Dispatch. If they endorse Canon, that's just all the more reason to use Nikon. This company can't get anything right.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom