click picture to go to my small gallery ( I am still learning to navigate the forum)

[thereBound1]

 

[Shipman]

What is the subject in this shot? Im seeing nothing other than a low quality snapshot. Im not trying to come off ignorant but I dont see what youre going with in this shot. Also consider using a different site to host your photos, photobucket will destroy the pic quality. I suggest flickr.

 

[thereBound1]

Water need not be explained to the thirsty either you get it or not - not all will not all won't- but a moment in time explains itself even through our error of expression- but only for those who wish to listen and be taught and not be the teacher--thanks for the view---

 

[Shipman]

Good explanation...

 

[KmH]

I have used Photobucket for several years and have had zero problems with photo quality.
I also have a Flickr account, and have had no photo quality problems with Flickr either, but I don't like the look of Flicker.

Here's a few of my photos that are hosted at Photobucket

 

[Braineack]

but only for those who wish to listen and be taught and not be the teacher--thanks for the view---

I suggest you heed to your own advice... I looked through your pictures and having nothing to learn from you.

 

[tecboy]

Do you have other photos beside these? You might want to go back there and take more photos in different angles. Shoot farther away and closer. Try different compositions. Pick a subject you like. The 1st image, if you want to show a graffiti, don't show the tree, fence, and girder. These are distracting. The other photos, the fences are too distracting and annoying. Take as many photos as you can and choose several the best you like. Just keep shooting and keep posting. You will finally get it.

 

[thereBound1]

To all- I photograph in manual only and capture the indiscriminate the view through obstacle- its work for the microwave, push button get it now spectator- no bells or whistle just what was actually there, as true as I can deliver it to you- to question why is it/was so, as this in existence -- if you wish --- I can write poetry about the city sanitation dump only if were truly there apart of it. I believe there is beauty and questions in and of all things. THE WALL TAG PHOTO- SEE THE LOCATION- the artists had to know it is not well traveled so who would see the work? It didn't matter the art had to come out of the artist like a plane that must emergency land and searches for touch down spot of safety- PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT SUPPOSED TO MAKE YOU THINK ABOUT THE PHOTOGRAPHER- (WEDDING PHOTOS) it should make think about what was shot--- when you look to comment more than look you are officially a politician- a picture puts you there to see--- a blown out picture of your lost loved one is still not discarded- I will not be a better photographer if I shoot just like you- I will be better if I learn to appreciate you for showing me something I probably would never ever see-- thank you for your views. °_* click

 

[Braineack]

gag me.

 

[Stevepwns]

What did I just read?? :banghead:

 

[thereBound1]

The aperture is an opera- wow- one can feel the wind- snow and cold--- k.w

 

[thereBound1]

Exactly.

 

[amolitor]

You have some ideas, I think, but these pictures are not particularly good. You're recording things, objects and scenes, that you find interesting when you see them. They ARE interesting when you see them. I do not think you are doing a good job of translating that interest to a photograph, though.

I quite like the building in the darkness, but the rest of them look to me very much like "Ah, yes. Abandoned places, shot by someone who has no idea yet how to convey the sensation of people there."

Don't shoot the object, shoot the feeling you have when see the object.

 

[Shipman]

Youre so moody and deep. Do you have time to educate me?

 

[thereBound1]

You forgot to add your fancy camera strap to your list of camera equipment..... This can aid you in your request.