rachelrach11
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2012
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 29
- Location
- Birmingham Al
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Light Guru said:The photo is fine.
However your logo is bigger then the child's head. A logo should not be so big that it almost becomes the main subject of your image.
Derrel said:In the modern aesthetic in which you are working, I think these are outstanding. I'm not 'personally' a fan of your style or aesthetic, but in terms of the modern, internet-era baby photographer genre, I think you hit on all the style points. I'm too old to want to shoot like this, but a lot of younger female shooters, and millions of moms, with checkbooks and Amuuurican $20 bills in stacks, like this style, and I think you're firing on all cylinders. As a "2013 Baby's 1-Year Cake Portrait", this kicks ass. it is VERY much of an era. THIS era.
tirediron said:Oughta be reported to the SPCC*!!!!
*Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Confectionary!
kathythorson said:I agree with Derrel that these shots are very run of the mill and a dime a dozen, but you nailed them as far as the technical aspects go. He is a doll face! I think to really take this idea and make your brand memorable, you have to create some ideas that are a bit out of the box.
manicmike said:The logos are really distracting. The images look good, but the logo really really distracts.
sarah_19_nz said:Cute! Agree with Derrel, nailed 'this particular style' shot.Love the pom poms too.