DX lens recommendations please

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by jamiebonline, Dec 26, 2015.

Tags:
  1. jamiebonline

    jamiebonline TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Ireland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    hi everyone and happy christmas,

    so wanting to keep this simple. i am looking for a lens or lenses not to exceed the sum of about 400 dollars.

    some points to help:

    i own a nikon dx camera with built in focus motor

    i can buy primes or zooms or indeed one zoom

    i don't want a 50mm prime lens! (75mm equiv on my crop body)

    the focal length i would like to cover is from about 24 - 100. This is not exact. Just a guide.

    i mostly shoot portraits but sometimes i need more room indoors so 50 is too tight or for group shots. i mostly do individuals and like decent bokeh. from time to time i do street photography.

    my camera is not great on high ISO so i think image stabilisation system would be good.

    sharpness is important but not an obsession ;) as long as it is noticeably sharper than a kit lens

    for the zooms, 2.8 aperture would be great but i would let it go if the lens was still a very good performer.

    OK let me know your suggestions, thanks. keep in mind the price. i know it's not much.


     
  2. jaomul

    jaomul Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2011
    Messages:
    5,714
    Likes Received:
    1,548
    Location:
    Cork Ireland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Sigma 17-50mms f2.8 os
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. PaulWog

    PaulWog No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2013
    Messages:
    1,153
    Likes Received:
    188
    Location:
    Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I also think the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS probably fits your needs the best.

    Being the enthusiast I am, I would put the idea out of doubling the budget and going with the 18-35 Art.
     
  4. jamiebonline

    jamiebonline TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Ireland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    35 though is too short. Even 50 on the zoom on dx isnt great...
     
  5. AKUK

    AKUK No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2015
    Messages:
    344
    Likes Received:
    266
    Location:
    Kent, United Kingdom
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    For $400 you're most likely going to have to make a sacrifice in some department or another, mainly in focal range or maximum aperture. Personally I think a zoom is a better bet for your needs, since you shoot groups and sometimes limited for space too. Do you currently own any off camera flash/triggers/light modifiers for your portraiture, or are you solely reliant upon natural light and artificial sources such as lamps and ceiling lights? If you do own OFC then a fast aperture lens isn't necessarily a prime concern, since you can use the flash as your light source.

    As for catering to street photography, that all depends on your style. Whether you get in peoples' faces or prefer a more candid approach. One of the best street photographers in the world, Jay Maisel, shoots with a Nikon 70-300mm VR, which is still very much in the "kit lens" category with regard to it's aperture and optical performance. I wouldn't factor street photography in too much, when making a decision on choosing a lens, as portraiture seems to me the mainstay of what you shoot.

    "Decent bokeh" is also somewhat subjective. Some love a swirling bokeh. Others hate it with a passion. A lot of the time a "decent bokeh" for portraiture is simply a soft/defocuses background that is non-distracting. For that, focal length is a bigger factor.

    As others have suggested, the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 OS is a versatile lens both for it's wide angle attributes, aperture and stabilization. For classic/beauty portraiture, it won't offer the best facial compression or defocusing of the background.

    It's a fraction over budget but, you could maybe look at a used 24-120mm f/4 VR. Not lightning fast but not slow either. It's a constant aperture so handy if you change the focal length and are using manual strobes. A very usable zoom range and certainly will offer better compression of portraiture. The 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 VR is a similar option.

    If you want to rock it old-school, then maybe look at the 35-70mm f/2.8D. A lovely sharp, professional optic that is built like a tank. No VR though, which may or may not be an issue for you. The 70mm will offer a better portrait option but the 35mm may not be wide enough for you either.

    Alternatively, if you did decide to go with primes, you could probably pick up a used 85mm f/1.8D and a 35mm f/1.8G for $400. Certainly lots of options out there. Ultimately it going to depend on your photography, what equipment you have available to you and what you feel will work the best.
     
  6. Peeb

    Peeb Semi-automatic Mediocrity Generator Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2015
    Messages:
    3,460
    Likes Received:
    2,932
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Sigma 17-70 2.8/4 maybe?

    Slows down as you get longer, but it has more range.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. DarkShadow

    DarkShadow Birdographer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    8,429
    Likes Received:
    4,562
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Agree on the 17-70mm.
     
  8. jcdeboever

    jcdeboever TPF Supporters Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2015
    Messages:
    18,080
    Likes Received:
    12,586
    Location:
    Michigan
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I really like my 85mm 1.8G. Super sharp lens, nice focal length on a DX body. Great bokeh. In your price range used but if you looked hard enough, should be able to find a new one darn at the $400 range.
     
  9. astroNikon

    astroNikon 'ya all Bananas I tell 'ya Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Messages:
    13,649
    Likes Received:
    3,325
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I think the 17-70 is your best bet

    But since you have a in-body focus motor I'll throw out there the Nikon 24-85/2.8-4.0 AF-D lens.
    It's an older design lens , though is still being made today and sold as new.
    72mm filter threads, builtin macro features.
    On the used market they are fairly inexpensive.
    And I used it for my main lens on my d7000 and now my d600.
     
  10. DB_Cro

    DB_Cro No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2015
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    73
    Location:
    Croatia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    The original post virtually describes the 17-50 2.8.. (either Sigma or Tamron).
    I'd get the 17-70 if ultimate IQ was second to range needed since the 17-50 does a bit better, BUT, 17-70 would be better for portraits.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. jamiebonline

    jamiebonline TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Ireland
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Hi, yes I have seen these for a good price. Do you have one? I can't seem to find out online at what point the widest aperture changes. Is it 2.8 til 50mm and then it changes to 4? Anyone know this? I also wonder how less sharp it is compared to the 17-50? Is it significant?
     
    Last edited: Dec 26, 2015
  12. DB_Cro

    DB_Cro No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2015
    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    73
    Location:
    Croatia
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit


    Both are rather soft at 2.8, but I'd rather shoot a portrait on the 17-50 at 50 & F4 then on the the 17-70 at 70 & 5.6 (to get it in the sweet spot of sharpness).
    On most of the lenses with variable aperture the widest aperture ends almost right away. If I remember correctly only the first few 'mm' are at 2.8. 21-22 or so
    and hits F/4 before 50mm. It's been a while since I used it.

    Someone will confirm this for sure.
     

Share This Page