- Joined
- Jun 19, 2009
- Messages
- 13,661
- Reaction score
- 4,898
- Location
- In your dreams!
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
- Thread Starter 🔹
- Moderator 🛠️
- #61
It's more about the MONEY than anything else!!
That's because we are a drug oriented culture. Don't blame that on education.
That's because we are a drug oriented culture. Don't blame that on education.
True. But it would be ignorant to say that everything taught in educational systems is perfect and has no flaws.
That is more correctly described as 'Taste'.I guess I worded it incorrectly what I was trying to say is that what I see as something I love and think looks good may not be for another person.
Hmmm...that's not really how art education works at all. Well, at least at a good university. Like anything, the quality of education varies, and you get what you pay for.And the issue with studying art is that someone always tries to tell you what is wrong and what is right and tries to curve your opinion and mold you into what THEY think art should be.
Perhaps this is because you don't understand it, and don't have the vocabulary to put into words why you like it or not.
You don't have the knowledge to truly appreciate abstract work, so it's easy to dismiss it.
Because you have to identify with a subject. If there is no straight forward subject, you are lost.
It is an uneducated opinion. Call it what it is.
A teacher is a guide, and should never force your creativity one direction or another. Well, a good teacher, that is. Teaching art is teaching a student to see, to question, to express themselves, to think, to challenge, and how to get all that out in an effective manner.And if I has someone who as teaching me about art and they thought that abastract was art and the only way to go was with abstract then it would most likely begin to curve my judgment away from my personal thoughts and views.
It's difficult to portray, because it's difficult to agrue any subject from a point of ignorance and lack of knowledge on the subject. Text or verbal argument would end in frustration for both parties, when it is unedumacated vs. edumacated on any given subject.Does that make sense? Very difficult to portray idea over message board, much easier to speak this kind of idea.
That's because we are a drug oriented culture. Don't blame that on education.
True. But it would be ignorant to say that everything taught in educational systems is perfect and has no flaws.
You can't say you don't need something like art education, because you have never had it. That just doesn't make sense. You don't know how you would feel looking at art through educated eyes. Why wouldn't you want to be able to see both sides and then have an educated opinion. If you still feel the same way, that it's not needed, more power to you.
That's because we are a drug oriented culture. Don't blame that on education.
True. But it would be ignorant to say that everything taught in educational systems is perfect and has no flaws.
True there is no absolute. But you shouldn't put forth an argument in such a simplistic manner. It's not because of education alone that doctors are drug happy. There are many factors involved. You blamed one.
I'm not going to look at a piece of art, not like it, then change my mind because I find it has some elements of artistic design.
A piece of art either pleases my eyes or doesn't.
I'm really just trying to stick up for the guy bitter bashed for being "unedamacated".
I'm really just trying to stick up for the guy bitter bashed for being "unedamacated".
Thank you Jake I do appreciate it, but as a correction I am female, LOL. Just as a side note.
I'm not going to look at a piece of art, not like it, then change my mind because I find it has some elements of artistic design.
A piece of art either pleases my eyes or doesn't.
In my own experience I have to say that after studying art for a while my tastes changed a bit. It's a slow process but over the years it happened.
I think an interesting, long term experiment would be to show some begining art students a twenty or so works of various mediums of varying quality. Some masterpieces and some worthless ****. None of these should be famous works that are the least bit recognizable. Have them write down a couple sentences for each one about what they liked, didn't like how they felt or whatever. Then, after four years of art classes as them to do it again. Assuming they haven't seen them since the original showing I'd be willing to bet that a lot of opinions would change, both ways.