Hi, I've just joined with the view to learning what I can that I may not already know or be familiar with.
I've been using the following equipment for about 2 years now:
Nikon D750
Nikon 50mm f1.8G
Nikon 200-500 f5.6
Tamron 90mm f2.8 SP macro
Tamron 15-30 F2.8 G2
Tamron 24-70 f2.8 G2
Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2
A few months ago I also got the Nikon Z5 with 16-50 and 50-250 kit.
At 59 years of age, hip and back ache, gear weight is a factor now so buying the Z50 was a journey into mirrorless and checking to see differences in kit weights and convenience etc.
I am aware that the DSLR kit I have is of decent quality but weight wise it is a chore every time I venture out and feel it when I return home.
There are things I like about both DSLR and Mirrorless but as you are all familiar with, it's hard to find that perfect camera to do everything you want it to do.
I enjoy macro, wildlife, landscape and with my 1st grandchild on the way, portraits must be added to that list.
With the DSLR kit I have, I believe I am well covered for those genres of photography, but I'd like to lighten the load and gain some new tech like a built in long exposure facility up to 15 minutes as in the Nikon Z7 etc and I'd like to attain the ability to do focus stacking as in the Z7 facilities.
So this is my thoughts and the questions.
Would you trade all the above, bar the 200-500mm, the Tamron 90mm macro and the 50mm f 1.8 against a Nikon Z7 or 6ii with 14-30 F4 and 24-200 f4? I'd be lightening the load considerably but still maintaining enough equipment to cover all aspects of the photography I like.
Although the Tamron 90mm macro would become a manual focus, I would have IBIS and focus peaking.
I could cover the same focal lengths as the Tamron 15-30, Tamron 24-70 and Tamron 70-200, but dropping down to F4 compared to F2.8.
With the FTZ adaptor, the 50mm 1.8 could be the go to portrait lens and the 200-500 the wildlife lens.
At a future time, should I find myself going on holiday, I would have the 24-200 lens to cover most things and I could possibly trade the Tamron 90mm and 50mm 1.8 in for the Nikon Z 105 MC to cover the macro and portrait end of things.
What would your views be if you found yourself in my position?
Grin and bear the weight as long as physically possible, or cast that weight off with the loss of better glass?
Thanks in advance.
I've been using the following equipment for about 2 years now:
Nikon D750
Nikon 50mm f1.8G
Nikon 200-500 f5.6
Tamron 90mm f2.8 SP macro
Tamron 15-30 F2.8 G2
Tamron 24-70 f2.8 G2
Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2
A few months ago I also got the Nikon Z5 with 16-50 and 50-250 kit.
At 59 years of age, hip and back ache, gear weight is a factor now so buying the Z50 was a journey into mirrorless and checking to see differences in kit weights and convenience etc.
I am aware that the DSLR kit I have is of decent quality but weight wise it is a chore every time I venture out and feel it when I return home.
There are things I like about both DSLR and Mirrorless but as you are all familiar with, it's hard to find that perfect camera to do everything you want it to do.
I enjoy macro, wildlife, landscape and with my 1st grandchild on the way, portraits must be added to that list.
With the DSLR kit I have, I believe I am well covered for those genres of photography, but I'd like to lighten the load and gain some new tech like a built in long exposure facility up to 15 minutes as in the Nikon Z7 etc and I'd like to attain the ability to do focus stacking as in the Z7 facilities.
So this is my thoughts and the questions.
Would you trade all the above, bar the 200-500mm, the Tamron 90mm macro and the 50mm f 1.8 against a Nikon Z7 or 6ii with 14-30 F4 and 24-200 f4? I'd be lightening the load considerably but still maintaining enough equipment to cover all aspects of the photography I like.
Although the Tamron 90mm macro would become a manual focus, I would have IBIS and focus peaking.
I could cover the same focal lengths as the Tamron 15-30, Tamron 24-70 and Tamron 70-200, but dropping down to F4 compared to F2.8.
With the FTZ adaptor, the 50mm 1.8 could be the go to portrait lens and the 200-500 the wildlife lens.
At a future time, should I find myself going on holiday, I would have the 24-200 lens to cover most things and I could possibly trade the Tamron 90mm and 50mm 1.8 in for the Nikon Z 105 MC to cover the macro and portrait end of things.
What would your views be if you found yourself in my position?
Grin and bear the weight as long as physically possible, or cast that weight off with the loss of better glass?
Thanks in advance.