how it should have ended:
The_Traveler:
"for those who were unsure as to the differences with my style:
my pictures tend to be less focused on the way the person looked. I try to avoid up close pictures that make the subject the center of attraction. They're usually, in fact, a small part of it. the pictures tend to focus on an action taking place that combine the subject with the photographer's vision and less on the way they look to achieve the desired impact.
that is part of what i see in the power of street photography. catching that moment when something happens that is interesting and intriguing. In this sense, it provides an experience beyond general portraiture. If I took this photo, the question I might ask myself is; if this man was my son or brother or father and he was having a really rough time with life and looked like hell, would I take his picture and put it on the Internet? the answer is a difficult one because what makes art ART is that it is emotionally provocative, whether it be positive or negative emotion. If something fills you with anger, it still means that as a piece of art, it has done it's job. but it's also important to remember that everything in life is a matter of perception. while i may view this as an unhappy homeless man, it could be someone that, over time, you've developed a relationship with, which seems more the likely since you make a point of mentioning he's a nice man that lives downtown.
it's less my style, but it takes all types and that's what makes the world go round. just my two cents. thanks for sharing!"
when you read it the right way, it's actually quite educational! I, for one, learned something today! for anyone who doesn't know the reference 'how it should have ended', youtube it. look to your left. look to your right. if there's someone there, HUGGGG :hug::.