Kat28
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2010
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Central/Southern Ca
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
My camera has a maximum ISO of 1600... My lens only has an aperture range of f/4 - 22 at 55 mm; f/5.6 - 32 at 200 mm
That can't be good...
I can't imagine shooting with a 75-300mm, as I'm often a foot from the bull and the 55-200mm is frustrating enough.
...hah. And here's the first thing my lens review reads on Nikon AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED review test
"
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Focus[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It's slow.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It's only half an AF-S lens."[/FONT]
It's looking like I got suckered into this lens, though it's been by my side in every other circumstance and never let me down. I obviously only spent a measly $200 on it. Could my lens be my main problem? Should I look into renting a different one or do you all feel it's still imperative I try a better camera, too? I'm a starving photographer. lol
Thanks for the recent responses [/FONT]
That can't be good...
I can't imagine shooting with a 75-300mm, as I'm often a foot from the bull and the 55-200mm is frustrating enough.
...hah. And here's the first thing my lens review reads on Nikon AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED review test
"
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=+1]PERFORMANCE [/SIZE]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Focus[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It's slow.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]It's only half an AF-S lens."[/FONT]
It's looking like I got suckered into this lens, though it's been by my side in every other circumstance and never let me down. I obviously only spent a measly $200 on it. Could my lens be my main problem? Should I look into renting a different one or do you all feel it's still imperative I try a better camera, too? I'm a starving photographer. lol
Thanks for the recent responses