Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The huge successful TV show House has a slightly different budget than the OP using a Canon 60D....
The huge successful TV show House has a slightly different budget than the OP using a Canon 60D....
But this doesn't change the fact that you referred to the DSLR video capability as a gimmick. So which is it?
I realize what the OP posted. You posted that video in a DSLR was a gimmick.
The video feature on SLR's is a gimmick, it works but with lots of flaws.
Someone better tell this to the folks that are in the "Biz" before they go and do something silly like film the season finale of a hugely successful television series on a DSLR....... Oops.... Too late.
Canon 5D Mark II used to shoot entire House season finale, director says it's 'the future' -- Engadget
The huge successful TV show House has a slightly different budget than the OP using a Canon 60D....
The video feature on SLR's is a gimmick...
We used a Canon 7D or 1D Mark IV for all the subway scenes; I could just carry a 7D and shoot on the subway all day with a very small crew. I did some tests with my wife beforehand to figure out my ASA, my stop, and how I was going to deal with the focus. I didnt use any rigs with it because I wasnt trying to shoot in the traditional way. I tested a bunch of different exposures and then brought the footage to Charlie Hertzfeld at Technicolor, who put it in the system so I could look at the highlights, the moiré and the resolution. Then I went back to the drawing board to do more tests. The 7D has more depth of field than the 5D, but I needed that because I didnt have a follow-focus unit and needed to work really fast. I shot everything documentary-style. I did all the focus pulls by hand, and wed just look at it on the cameras monitor. I ended up shooting on a Canon 24mm lens at 1,600 ASA to get as much depth of field as possible at a stop of T81⁄2.
omg no thanks! 25 hours to cull through?! Yuck.Check this thread out that I posted of the videographer who covered a wedding with us.
They had 4 guys shooting and they came home with 25 hours worth of video from that day.
Here's the link : http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/general-shop-talk/243244-behind-scenes.html
omg no thanks! 25 hours to cull through?! Yuck.Check this thread out that I posted of the videographer who covered a wedding with us.
They had 4 guys shooting and they came home with 25 hours worth of video from that day.
Here's the link : http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/general-shop-talk/243244-behind-scenes.html
The video feature on SLR's is a gimmick, it works but with lots of flaws. In alot of cases you will be better to buy that cheap video-recorder or even an iPhone4 will do a much better job and not to mention the size difference.
I posted an unedited vid of me biking down whistler mountain with an iPhone 3Gs which doesn't have the video quality of an iPhone4.