TimmyD11
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2017
- Messages
- 158
- Reaction score
- 10
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
As to the above in-camera HDR differences; the Nikon sensor has a 2.3-EV edge in totoal dynamic range over the 6D, so, that could get very good in-camera HDR with fewer needed exposures. In my own experience, the 2.3 EV DR advantage is a huge one in favor of the Nikon.
Yeah, that's crossed my mind, that since, with the D610, dynamic range overall in regular shooting is better I might have less of a need for in camera HDR, but I do like Canon's 3 shot merging HDR over Nikon's 2 shot merging HDR.
Still, you have the 28-105 and the 85/1.8 EF lenses for Canon and that one other EF lens. My original suggestion was a used Canon 5D or used Canon 6D, for those three lenses. I still stand by that suggestion for you if you want to keep shooting those lenses.
Well, if I can get over the fact that Nikon's specs are so much better then it would be nice to have a 3 lens headstart, even if they might not be the best considering how old they are and how much better newer lenses are with lens technology advancements.
The 95 overall score is VERY high...the 82 overall score is equalled or bettered now by the very best of APS-C cameras, but for me, the FF-sized sensors are what I prefer. I think the FF sensor cameras work the best with the most lenses out there, and there is a LOT of Canon EF glass on the new and used market.
Yes, it's the numbers that are causing my hangup and indecision. The D7200 APS-C can be gotten for $999 new and it's overall score is better than the full frame 6D, which is $400 more new. But can I really trust that to mean that I'd get better pictures with the D7200?
Last edited: