Image Quality & Sensor Size

[Ysarex84 78]

clai
Neither is yours, your post is the X1d not the H5D or the H6D
So your post doesn't not apply, Sorry
Donny

You're the one who made this ridiculous claim:

No i said the H5 is 14 stops more then most full frame camera not 14 total lol

28% more light available 28% more light available.....

The burden of proof is on you to defend it -- you made it. Provide a supporting link for that claim -- a link to support even half that claim. Until you do I call total nonsense -- you must be clueless.

Joe

 

[Ysarex84 78]

Neither is yours, your post is the X1d not the H5D or the H6D
So your post doesn't not apply, Sorry
Donny

No i said the H5 is 14 stops more then most full frame camera not 14 total lol

28% more light available 28% more light available.....

Nikon D850 : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 14.8
Nikon D810 : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 14.8
Nikon D800 : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 14.4
Nikon D600 : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 14.2
Nikon D750 : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 14.5
Sony A7R II : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 13.9
Sony a9 : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 13.3
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 13.6
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 13.5
Canon EOS 5DS : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 12.4
Canon EOS 6D Mark II : Tests and Reviews | DxOMark 11.9

Here's a little help. Above are your "most full frame cameras" with their DXO mark DR ratings. The average DR then is 13.75 stops. Let's just call it 13 to make the math easy. So you're claiming a Hasselbald H5 has a DR recording capacity of 27 stops. Do you understand how clearly ridiculous that claim is? Pray tell what digital camera is even capable of recording 20 stops of DR?

Your original claim that the H5 is capable of 14 stops of DR is correct. But that's old tech and now even a Nikon D800 is better. Which I already told you.

Joe

 

[Derrel]

I think he meant "14 stops, which is more than most full frame cameras," which makes sense. I tell ya...when I got my first FX Nikon that had a wide-DR sensor (the Nikon D3x) back in July of 2012--I was in HEAVEN, since my then-best camera was my Canon 5D "Classic", which had about 10.9 stops...and I'd also been shooting the dismally-sensored Nikon D2x since 2005, and that camera had a __pathetic__sensor at any ISO above 320...

Still...it's not "just" about the DR rating: the ISO invariability and the ability to "recover" shadows without noise and artifacts, is what makes the Sony EXMOR-generation sensors simply astounding.

The Dxo Mark sensor score of the D2x, which I bought May 3,2005, for $4,995.95, was like a 56 score...today, a $399 Nikon D3300 blows that camera's technical image quality away...

The new-genration Nikons with the DxO mark scores in the mid-80-and up range offer astounding image quality.