I mean...from a linguist stand point...all languages are equally easy to learn, assuming you are immersed in them during the appropriate critical periods of development. A baby who is immersed in Chinese, English, and/or whatever, will be proficient in all of them.
Thank you! All languages are equally accessible as a first language. A person's first language may influence the relative difficulty in learning a second language, and even then, there's a lot of individual variation.
I mean...from a linguist stand point...all languages are equally easy to learn, assuming you are immersed in them during the appropriate critical periods of development. A baby who is immersed in Chinese, English, and/or whatever, will be proficient in all of them.
There are people that are unable to learn languages too though.
Do you mean people who could never learn a first language or a second language? The only things that interfere with the acquisition of a first language is lack of proper input or issues of abnormal cognition. Otherwise any child can learn any language given proper exposure during the acquisition period (which
does have an endpoint. If a person isn't exposed to language by about puberty, it's very unlikely they would ever gain competence in a first language.)
Learning a second language is a different story, and part of what affects a persons ability to learn a second language is competence in their first. Even when an adult can master vocabulary and grammar of a second language, they almost always have an accent in the second language. The accent is milder if that person was exposed to other languages while still a child, but it's still there.
And might I point out that we've been told that English has a) very few rules, and b) too many rules, and also told to not discuss semantics in a thread about linguistics. The irony is thick in here, folks
English spelling is a hot mess, but its grammatical structure is much more consistent than most people think.