When did I say that you have to shoot in full manual in order to be a good photographer? I was talking about learning how to photograph so please don't distort and twist my words.
If anyone is being an elitist here it is you, and your unnecessary attack on me for having an opinion on how learning manual first makes things easier.
Even with what you said, the only time manual isn't the way to go is when you do not need or want full creative control over the exposure. Next time don't attack someone who is actually adding constructive arguments to the conversation.

it is not very nice and misguided.
I apologize for my post. I have a problem with manual snobs who think that manual is what real photographers use, and that if you use anything else, you aren't a photographer. My post still stands for them, but for you, please accept my sincere apology.
That said, I still have to completely disagree with the part of your quote that I boldfaced. Contrary to what people seem to think for some reason, you still have nearly full creative control using priority modes. You don't need manual for creative control. There are only 3 situations I use manual. 1) In situations where I'm certain the meter is going to get confused. And even in this situation, I can usually still use a priority mode to compensate (for example, over exposing by a stop in snow). 2) In situations where the exposure I want is more or less than 2 stops of what the meter says is correct. This is only because my camera won't do exposure compensation more than that. If my camera could do more, I wouldn't use manual. 3) When I'm shooting with flash.
People don't realize just how sophisticated their camera's computer and meter is. What purpose is there for basically throwing that out the window? Use the meter, trust the meter, learn what metering modes to use, and when. You will save yourself a lot of trouble.