What's new

Leica without monitor

Well, theres always the upcoming Konost FF for those who want a "cheap Leica": Camera

Still has a monitor, though. I think also lifeview ?

I sort of doubt that this camera will ever exist. Also, while it'll be cheaper than a Leica, the sensor they are using isn't "budget" by any means. Paired with a mechanical rangefinder, my guess is that this will be about a $2000-5000 camera body in FF.


that being said, if I had the money, I would shoot with a Leica S medium format digital camera.
Leica S Edition 100 Medium Format DSLR Camera with 30mm 10805

its not that im unappreciative of a Leica, its just I cannot afford one.

As far as medium format goes, $20K doesn't seem THAT outlandish for a kit that includes a body and two lenses.

Hasselblad H4D-40 Black Limited Edition Medium H-70380534-B B&H
 
hum .. find a new use for duct tape. In the past I only know if anything move which is not suppose to, use duct tape and if anything not move which is not suppose to, use WD40.
 
Another advantage to the Leica S is that it's not Hasselblad.

That should be worth something.
 
Leica M-D Typ 262 Camera Model Registered In Korea | Leica Rumors

Its called "M-D Typ 262" ("Typ" is german for "type", just like "Monchrom" is german for "monochrome").

The name reminds of the "M Typ 262", which of course is a lot cheaper than the unmodified "M Typ 240", so my guess would be the "M-D Typ 262" will also be cheaper, not more expensive, than a regular "M Typ 240".

It will be announced on Thursday, Mar 10 2016.
 
They need to keep dumbing them down because their target audience has more money than brains. Lol

I have a 1923 Leica but its a display item.
I wouldn't buy one to use. Other cameras do as well and some do better for less money.
I looked at it, its an ugly box of a thing.
Lol
 
They need to keep dumbing them down because their target audience has more money than brains. Lol

I have a 1923 Leica but its a display item.
I wouldn't buy one to use. Other cameras do as well and some do better for less money.
I looked at it, its an ugly box of a thing.
Lol
My Leica's are the best cameras I have ever owned

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk
 
They need to keep dumbing them down because their target audience has more money than brains. Lol

I have a 1923 Leica but its a display item.
I wouldn't buy one to use. Other cameras do as well and some do better for less money.
I looked at it, its an ugly box of a thing.
Lol
My Leica's are the best cameras I have ever owned

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk
What specifically does a leica do that no other camera can? And why?
 
They need to keep dumbing them down because their target audience has more money than brains. Lol

I have a 1923 Leica but its a display item.
I wouldn't buy one to use. Other cameras do as well and some do better for less money.
I looked at it, its an ugly box of a thing.
Lol
My Leica's are the best cameras I have ever owned

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk
What specifically does a leica do that no other camera can? And why?
Mine are film M's they are a joy to use with the bright rangefinder, I sold most off my Canon gear because after using a Leica M there was no going back i also gave up on digital

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
I never cared for Canon either.
Its too bad you gave up on an emerging tech before it had matured.
 
Watchful said:
What specifically does a leica do that no other camera can? And why?

It excites nouveau riche asian-market buyers who are eager for high-status items that can be worn on a strap, in public. Buyers in these emerging markets are extremely anxious for the release of all types of new, expensive, low-production goods, and the Leica red dot is a major boner-producer for buyers in countries where public display of "status items" is a big deal, and part of the cultural norms.

Multiple luxury goods manufacturers know that newly-emerging markets with new-money types are where their sales growth potential is the highest. Leica cameras and lenses are made to exceptionally high standards, but they have become less the tools of working photographers and serious enthusiasts, and much more so status symbols worn on a strap, by those who seek social recognition from strangers.

The Leica has become the new Rolex wristwatch--an anachronism that has lost favor in rich societies, but is still considered a powerful status object in emerging countries; in the USA, a $7,999 camera is nowhere near the status symbol of a $150,000 automobile, or a second home.
 
Now you can own any camera and have it with out a monitor.
1711473_2000x2000.jpg


If the women dont find you handsome.webp


Of course it will put the true meaning of Point and Shoot into the mirrorless crowd.
 
I never cared for Canon either.
Its too bad you gave up on an emerging tech before it had matured.
Digital is going nowhere for me iso is getting ridiculous it's not tactile

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom