Logo?

[ababysean]

I've been working on some, a friend made two and I played myself with another.
Do you like any of them.
I want a purple martin (bird) in my logo because it is a special memory I have with my dad and my dad with his dad....
The "Belle" part of my name is what my grandfather called me growing up...

1.

2.

3.

 

[dustin0479]

Are you planning on using these as your sig on photographs?

 

[ababysean]

no.
Edit because I did not read your entire question.
I did not see you said "on your photographs"
I plan on using this as my sig, but not on my photographs.

 

[ababysean]

 

[tirediron]

I like this one, but I would change the text so that if follows the curve of the branch.

 

[ababysean]

 

[PhotoXopher]

I'll just be honest, I don't really care for any of them myself.

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

You're logo suggests you are a pro nature photog.

 

[Boomn4x4]

I'll just be honest, I don't really care for any of them myself.

+1. I see "Crystal Belle Photography".... and the bird makes absolutly no sense to me. Why is the bird there? What is the signifcance of the bird?

I understand it has a lot of meaning to you... but, to say it bluntly, that doesn't mean crap to anyone else. I think its great that it serves as a very important memory to you and I can sympathize with the sentiment.... but nobody else really cares.

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

The name makes me think it's someone who takes pictures of bells made of crystal.

 

[DerekMellott]

The font on 3 is way over used, like comic sans:thumbdown:. Please use a different font.

 

[jdjen]

You're logo suggests you are a pro nature photog.

1- Your logo does suggest what Bitter Jeweler stated.
2- They all look very cartoonish like a 3rd grade art project.
3- I would not want that logo on any work you did for me no matter how good
your work is, i.e. family photo, weddings, senior pics, etc.
4- The name, although it means something to you, is not memorable.

 

[white]

You should also be aware that the graphic and color of your logo could potentially conflict with the image you put it on.

Simple really is better. Some of the best I've seen were just the photogs name in a modern font with the opacity dropped.

 

[Derrel]

You're logo suggests you are a pro nature photog.

1- Your logo does suggest what Bitter Jeweler stated.
2- They all look very cartoonish like a 3rd grade art project.
3- I would not want that logo on any work you did for me no matter how good
your work is, i.e. family photo, weddings, senior pics, etc.
4- The name, although it means something to you, is not memorable.

Di-zactly!

 

[ababysean]

wait.
I don't plan to put this on my photos.
I don't really want to mark my photos at all, and if/when I do, I will use a simple font, in the bottom right corner, very small.
I would put this on CD labels, stickers, packaging, any templates I make for flyers.