What's new

Model shot/portrait

Status
Not open for further replies.
Derrel likes the girls with the titties way up high, way up firm an' high oh yeah workin on our.. uh sorry.

Bob Seger's Night Moves...ahhh...I remember that song...
 
Her eyes look wayyy overcooked. Like maybe she's on bath salts!!! And, uh...wazzup with her breasts??? Can there actually *be* that much space between her shoulder line and her breasts?? I mean, it looks like she was "stretched" in post...'cause the girls appear to be riding mighty,mighty low...

I'll make sure she gets to read that, very helpful comment about her breasts for future shots.

Easy....I suspect they appear to be on her knees because of post, not because she really looks like that
 
Geez, her tits are right where they should be. Her shoulders are very narrow, and she's not wearing a bra. Look at her head, see how big it is? Now go look at some girls.

Her belly button is lower than you think it is, probably right around the BOTTOM edge of that horizontal sash/belt thing on the dress.
 
They where where they were supposed to be ON HER in the 1st pic too, they just appear slightly low in the image
bigthumb.gif
 
I think she needs to eat a hamburger

I think she is perfect! I really dislike this bias against skinny / slender people that the US is developing just because the new norm seems to be overweight to obese! Do you prefer BIG BEAUTIFUL WOMEN? I don't think there is such a thing... it is a contradiction in terms! :)

Of course, if you were just trying to be funny, then ignore my statement above! :)
 
Geez, her tits are right where they should be. Her shoulders are very narrow, and she's not wearing a bra. Look at her head, see how big it is? Now go look at some girls.

Her belly button is lower than you think it is, probably right around the BOTTOM edge of that horizontal sash/belt thing on the dress.

Pure genius.
 
I think she needs to eat a hamburger

Yea, I was wondering what kind of magazine would put this on the cover. "Anorexia Fashion"?
 
I think she's attractive, but I'm curious about her breasts as well. I know that on some male models they move their nipples to a more ideal (???) area, but I'm not sure about her breasts. They seem like they're in the middle of her torso. She might just be very tall and have that sort of physique, though. It's just the first thing my eyes are drawn to.

I'm digging the overall feel though. It's different from the normal "look at my kids! LOOK AT THEM!" threads that are posted quite frequently.
 
I think she's attractive, but I'm curious about her breasts as well. I know that on some male models they move their nipples to a more ideal (???) area, but I'm not sure about her breasts. They seem like they're in the middle of her torso. She might just be very tall and have that sort of physique, though. It's just the first thing my eyes are drawn to.

I'm digging the overall feel though. It's different from the normal "look at my kids! LOOK AT THEM!" threads that are posted quite frequently.

Exactly. But according to amonitor, they are exactly where they are on every other single woman who has ever walked the face of the earth...not uber-low-set and oodly close to her belly button...
 
I don't care for the way the technique in #1 emphasizes her bony physique, and/or makes her appear bony and stretched. My eyes focus on her chest where the skin appears thin across her ribs and sternum. It's unsettling, though that may be the desired effect.

The more natural look in #2 is easier on my eyes, and the model's expression seems more relaxed.

I understand she's a pale woman, and that's a striking feature, but I think the choice of blue clothing and a cool background in both images is cool overkill. I'd try warming up the background and see how that feels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom