Model shot/portrait

[53cent]

I think she's attractive, but I'm curious about her breasts as well. I know that on some male models they move their nipples to a more ideal (???) area, but I'm not sure about her breasts. They seem like they're in the middle of her torso. She might just be very tall and have that sort of physique, though. It's just the first thing my eyes are drawn to.

I'm digging the overall feel though. It's different from the normal "look at my kids! LOOK AT THEM!" threads that are posted quite frequently.

I'm haven't done anything to her breasts, they're just as they are. But thanks for the comment.

 

[53cent]

I think she needs to eat a hamburger

Yea, I was wondering what kind of magazine would put this on the cover. "Anorexia Fashion"?

Give her a sammich ASAP.

Stay away with BS posts like this please.

 

[amolitor]

Exactly. But according to amonitor, they are exactly where they are on every other single woman who has ever walked the face of the earth...not uber-low-set and oodly close to her belly button...

Seriously, dude, why you gotta be that way?

Her nipples are about one head height down from her chin. That's where nipples are. I know it looks weird, but it's because her shoulders are narrow.

 

[Granddad]

I'm surprised at the comments some well respected people have made about the way this young lady is built. She may not be everyone's cup of tea but that's the way the cookie crumbles. The OP submitted a photo for C&C of his photography and processing, not for the model to be dissected. If I submit a photo of my wife for C&C is she going to have her wrinkles analysed and her saggy breasts discussed like this? This isn't the first time a thread has gone off topic like this recently.

OP: I much prefer the second shot, it shows the model to better advantage IMHO (I'm not fond of the catwalk look) and the lines on the container add to the image. Personally I'd straighten it so that the lines are vertical but maybe that's just me being OCD. Nice job of using the available light.

 

[cgipson1]

Give her a sammich ASAP.

Grow up!

 

[JerseyJules]

I think she needs to eat a hamburger

Yea, I was wondering what kind of magazine would put this on the cover. "Anorexia Fashion"?

Give her a sammich ASAP.

Stay away with BS posts like this please.

Ok how about this one?

Your picture is disturbing to look at,it hurts my eyes and my soul.... The model looks very skinny obviously. Combine that with a low cut and open dress and it exaggerates the fact that she is pale and thin. It keeps drawing your attention to her chest plate in an unnatural and distracting manner. She is a beautiful girl with gorgeous eyes and facial structure,but wardrobe selection has pretty much distracted anyone looking at the picture from even acknowledging that. The picture while it may be textbook perfect as far as the photographic skill involved, lacks any real interest other than over exasperating her physical attributes in a less than flattering manner. So congratulations, you made a beautiful girl look bad with poor representation...I cant see what magazine would look at that representation of her and think "yeah that's the one lets publish it"...

Disclaimer: I know less than nothing about photography, Im just giving you my personal advice on how I see the picture and the thought process of the general public..

 

[JerseyJules]

One more:


Portrait by Ismar Basic, on Flickr

Much better representation of this girl's beauty..

 

[SoonerBJJ]

I really like the second one, except as mentioned the processing to the eyes needs to be toned down. Looks very unnatural and detracts greatly from what I would otherwise consider a very good image.

At first glance and from a distance, I liked #1 okay but at closer inspection the selection and cutting around the head and stray hairs is really bad. Kills it for me. Was the background so bad that you feel it benefits from this edit?

And, the comments about the model are beyond juvenile. Makes it easier to spot the jackasses, I suppose.

 

[53cent]

Yea, I was wondering what kind of magazine would put this on the cover. "Anorexia Fashion"?

Give her a sammich ASAP.

Stay away with BS posts like this please.

Ok how about this one?

Your picture is disturbing to look at,it hurts my eyes and my soul.... The model looks very skinny obviously. Combine that with a low cut and open dress and it exaggerates the fact that she is pale and thin. It keeps drawing your attention to her chest plate in an unnatural and distracting manner. She is a beautiful girl with gorgeous eyes and facial structure,but wardrobe selection has pretty much distracted anyone looking at the picture from even acknowledging that. The picture while it may be textbook perfect as far as the photographic skill involved, lacks any real interest other than over exasperating her physical attributes in a less than flattering manner. So congratulations, you made a beautiful girl look bad with poor representation...I cant see what magazine would look at that representation of her and think "yeah that's the one lets publish it"...

Disclaimer: I know less than nothing about photography, Im just giving you my personal advice on how I see the picture and the thought process of the general public..

If that is your more explained opinion, fine. You don't like the picture, there is nothing wrong with that. But you obviously have no clue about fashion and especially about European fashion and the way high fashion models look like. I even added more contrast to the chest area to make her look the way she is; pale and skinny. I edited it the way I like a model to look like in a fashion shot like this. And yes they are going to publish it. And If you find this hurting your soul, wait until you see really skinny high fashion models.

 

[Designer]

Ok how about this one?

Your picture is disturbing to look at,it hurts my eyes and my soul.... The model looks very skinny obviously. Combine that with a low cut and open dress and it exaggerates the fact that she is pale and thin. It keeps drawing your attention to her chest plate in an unnatural and distracting manner. She is a beautiful girl with gorgeous eyes and facial structure,but wardrobe selection has pretty much distracted anyone looking at the picture from even acknowledging that. The picture while it may be textbook perfect as far as the photographic skill involved, lacks any real interest other than over exasperating her physical attributes in a less than flattering manner. So congratulations, you made a beautiful girl look bad with poor representation...I cant see what magazine would look at that representation of her and think "yeah that's the one lets publish it"...

Disclaimer: I know less than nothing about photography, Im just giving you my personal advice on how I see the picture and the thought process of the general public..

Other commentors have pointed out that this photo is NOT "textbook perfect".

 

[2WheelPhoto]

this thread is approaching fail mode quickly

 

[Robin Usagani]

Well.. this kind of clothing is mostly shown on runways. I highly doubt you see one on the street (maybe in LA). She is very beautiful the way she is. Yes, you are drawn to the light area on her chest, I am pretty sure that was the clothing designer's intention.

 

[JerseyJules]

Stay away with BS posts like this please.

Ok how about this one?

Your picture is disturbing to look at,it hurts my eyes and my soul.... The model looks very skinny obviously. Combine that with a low cut and open dress and it exaggerates the fact that she is pale and thin. It keeps drawing your attention to her chest plate in an unnatural and distracting manner. She is a beautiful girl with gorgeous eyes and facial structure,but wardrobe selection has pretty much distracted anyone looking at the picture from even acknowledging that. The picture while it may be textbook perfect as far as the photographic skill involved, lacks any real interest other than over exasperating her physical attributes in a less than flattering manner. So congratulations, you made a beautiful girl look bad with poor representation...I cant see what magazine would look at that representation of her and think "yeah that's the one lets publish it"...

Disclaimer: I know less than nothing about photography, Im just giving you my personal advice on how I see the picture and the thought process of the general public..

If that is your more explained opinion, fine. You don't like the picture, there is nothing wrong with that. But you obviously have no clue about fashion and especially about European fashion and the way high fashion models look like. I even added more contrast tot the chest area to make her look the way she is; pale and skinny. I edited it the way I like a model to look like in a fashion like this. And yes, they are going to publish it. And If you find this hurting your soul, wait until you see really skinny high fashion models.

Yeah, I get it..Models are supposed to be skinny..Thats not the issue for me, I like women in all sorts of shapes and sizes. To me its just an awkward and distracting picture that does that girl zero justice. Looking at some of her other pictures she is not that skinny actually, but for some reason that dress kills it for me...It just makes you keep looking downward to her chest. Fashion or not, it's a bad representation of her for me...You wanted CC, you got it..Sorry I cant add any CC on the actual technical aspect of the shot..

 

[JerseyJules]

Other commentors have pointed out that this photo is NOT "textbook perfect".

Yeah, no kidding..The most talented photographer in the world could post a perfect picture on here and you guys would rip it apart..lol..However Im not qualified to even begin to make any technical assessment of the actual photo, just my personal opinion of the overall image. I would however like to see more of this girl

 

[53cent]

Ok how about this one?

Your picture is disturbing to look at,it hurts my eyes and my soul.... The model looks very skinny obviously. Combine that with a low cut and open dress and it exaggerates the fact that she is pale and thin. It keeps drawing your attention to her chest plate in an unnatural and distracting manner. She is a beautiful girl with gorgeous eyes and facial structure,but wardrobe selection has pretty much distracted anyone looking at the picture from even acknowledging that. The picture while it may be textbook perfect as far as the photographic skill involved, lacks any real interest other than over exasperating her physical attributes in a less than flattering manner. So congratulations, you made a beautiful girl look bad with poor representation...I cant see what magazine would look at that representation of her and think "yeah that's the one lets publish it"...

Disclaimer: I know less than nothing about photography, Im just giving you my personal advice on how I see the picture and the thought process of the general public..

If that is your more explained opinion, fine. You don't like the picture, there is nothing wrong with that. But you obviously have no clue about fashion and especially about European fashion and the way high fashion models look like. I even added more contrast tot the chest area to make her look the way she is; pale and skinny. I edited it the way I like a model to look like in a fashion like this. And yes, they are going to publish it. And If you find this hurting your soul, wait until you see really skinny high fashion models.

Yeah, I get it..Models are supposed to be skinny..Thats not the issue for me, I like women in all sorts of shapes and sizes. To me its just an awkward and distracting picture that does that girl zero justice. Looking at some of her other pictures she is not that skinny actually, but for some reason that dress kills it for me...It just makes you keep looking downward to her chest. Fashion or not, it's a bad representation of her for me...You wanted CC, you got it..Sorry I cant add any CC on the actual technical aspect of the shot..[/QUOTE

CC is what I asked and therefore I find it not a problem that people give CC, it's just the way things are being said/described that I feel like saying something about it. There is nothing wrong with personal choice, don't get me wrong.