Mommy's Taking Her Shirt Off

[chrisburke]

Chris, I want your honest advice. You've been helpful in my other pictures, and, honestly, I don't think you honestly think that picture of my daughter is lame. I think you may have just been in a mood. -fingers crossed-

i already told you up top.. not in my first post, but one of the others... at least i'm pretty sure i did.. my honest CC is that it is too snap shotty for me.. and the whole picture content is a mess... REMEMBER this is all IMO.. the yellow thing really kills it for me and makes me say "what is the subject here" things like the shelf, the person in the background the shadow on the left side.. it just kills it for me... its too busy.

 

[manaheim]

stsinner... any chance you could enable private messages so I could PM you outside of the public eye? I don't want to contribute to the mess here. (I promise my message will be very pleasant and happy)

 

[stsinner]

stsinner... any chance you could enable private messages so I could PM you outside of the public eye? I don't want to contribute to the mess here. (I promise my message will be very pleasant and happy)

Oh, no problem-I wasn't aware that they were disabled...


Tried and couldn't figure it out... Enlight me, please..

 

[DRoberts]

just for the record, LAME is a critique..

You actually believe this?

 

[manaheim]

Oh, no problem-I wasn't aware that they were disabled...

Tried and couldn't figure it out... Enlight me, please..

I think there's some rule where you can't do it under X amount of posts, but you enabled email, so I'll email you.

 

[MelodySoul]

Now that's a stretch. Only a certain type of person would find this creepy, unless you think that looking at a 1 year old girl topless is somehow pornographic, in which case I wouldn't begin to know what to say to you.

Thank for the critique, though. Always appreciated, whether I agree with it, or not.

No, I don't think a 1 year old topless is creepy or pornographic in any way. I do however, find it creepy to see a sexual title and then have the content turn out to be a baby. I don't know...maybe I'm the only one but that was my initial reaction. :???:

 

[stsinner]

No, I don't think a 1 year old topless is creepy or pornographic in any way. I do however, find it creepy to see a sexual title and then have the content turn out to be a baby. I don't know...maybe I'm the only one but that was my initial reaction. :???:

Yeah, I think you're the only one...

 

[stsinner]

I think there's some rule where you can't do it under X amount of posts, but you enabled email, so I'll email you.

okay.. Thanks

 

[Helen B]

No, I don't think a 1 year old topless is creepy or pornographic in any way. I do however, find it creepy to see a sexual title and then have the content turn out to be a baby. I don't know...maybe I'm the only one but that was my initial reaction. :???:

You aren't the only one: I can see exactly what you mean, and I can see that it has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not you think that the image of a topless baby is pornographic - that was a truly creepy thing for stsinner to bring into the discussion.

There appears to be deliberate sexual innuendo in the title and, mild as it is, it does seem to me to be a little tacky to associate it with an image of a baby. It's stsinner's choice, however, not mine.

Yeah, I think you're the only one...

Sorry, but there is no way that you can know the views of every member of this forum.

Best,
Helen

 

[anubis404]

My humble opinion of the matter is that both posters are at fault in some way. The OP used a deceptive title to lure a viewer into a picture of a shot that he/she most likely just posted for the sake of posting. However that is more a matter of wrong forum than malicious intent. Chris had a right to be ticked off that yet another member was making a thread that was not intended for artistic critique, and using an inappropriate title. However, Chris did overreact, IMO, by calling the picture "lame".

Chris's comment was inappropriate, but I say get over it. The word "lame" is not something to start a flame war over, and the OP should've known that using a deceptive title to lure viewers to a picture that may not have fit the forum description would attract unwanted attention.

Just my opinion. Peace.

 

[zandman]

No, I don't think a 1 year old topless is creepy or pornographic in any way. I do however, find it creepy to see a sexual title and then have the content turn out to be a baby. I don't know...maybe I'm the only one but that was my initial reaction. :???:

ur not the only one, i'm with you.
two things, he's trying to be creative on making titles or he doesn't know that most of the viewers that will view the thread are either pervs or pro to give crits.

i guess you can just make a title that doesn't have a double meaning so you won't dissappoint the viewers..

 

[kundalini]

ur not the only one, i'm with you.
two things, he's trying to be creative on making titles or he doesn't know that most of the viewers that will view the thread are either pervs or pro to give crits.

:waiting: Which one am I?

 

[chrisburke]

i dont know if i posted this to a person in PM, or if it was in the thread, but the reason why i over reacted is because of the title... i didn't say that, but it bothered me, NOT because I was excited to see porn.. I'm not into porn, and if I wanted to see it, i think we all know theres lots on the net... i HATE it when people post titles whose intent is to lure people in, it down right upsets me... and this one especially, because of the fact that you used a pornographic title, for a child... its so disturbing, and that is why i seemed pissed in my orignal first post

 

[kundalini]

Well, it was all well and good until you last response Chris. Seems to be the antithesis to this thread. I think the sentiment has been passed several times today. Let sleeping dogs lie. Why do I care? .......................................because.

 

[chrisburke]

Well, it was all well and good until you last response Chris. Seems to be the antithesis to this thread. I think the sentiment has been passed several times today. Let sleeping dogs lie. Why do I care? .......................................because.

i dont know that i understand what your saying here... its late...