jcdeboever
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2015
- Messages
- 19,868
- Reaction score
- 16,081
- Location
- Michigan
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Right. I recently read that some of the leneses in the Fuji line correct stuff by the sensor. Which ones? I don't recall. I am totally happy with the Fuji system. The one lens I have trouble with is the 100-400. I haven't spent enough time with it on BIF's and stuff moving. I think its a combination of getting the right continuous shooting mode and the skill of the shooter. Other than that, I can't complain a bit. Every lens I have produces wonderful results.Wow, that is incredibly interesting performance. I noticed in certain modes that sx60hs did that. It sits on the shelf these days waiting for a restricted camera sporting event. To be honest, I did manage to get some very nice images out of it, especially on a tripod, with the VR turned off. Like Derrel said, I'm sure with your skill, it will serve you well.
I see this as an increasingly disturbing trend. Since I retired I only teach part-time now; two to four classes a year. Still I see a lot of different cameras; every new semester a new crop of students show up in my class with most of the standard entry level cameras and occasionally better (had a student last semester walk in with a D800). More and more now those entry level kit zooms are relying on software to correct increasingly severe distortion -- at least that's what I think I'm seeing. It's getting beyond the level of reasonable. We shouldn't have to tell everyone that they need to buy a lens with a red, gold or green stripe to get something decent.
When I made the switch a couple years ago from FX to DX I started shopping for lenses. The old mantra was: lenses take pictures and cameras hold film. It was the lens line that ultimately led me to select Fuji. They're not guilt free on this but at least they're not shameless.
Joe