Hi Byron. Welcome to the forum. I'm not sure if you're looking for feedback on the individual images or on your website, so I'm going to keep my comments to the website.
The first thing that stands out to me, looking at your wedding and portrait sections, is how few shoots are represented. Of the 30 wedding images, 23 are from one wedding while only 7 are from a second; of the 16 portrait images, 13 are from one shoot and three are from another. I can understand if you don't have many weddings under your belt to post but I would recommend getting more variety in your portraits section. As it is now a potential customer can see that you've worked with people a grand total of 4 times. I would recruit people to pose for portraits, either through trade or as paid models, to show that you have more experience working with people. If weddings are something you'd like to do more than occasionally you could even hire models to pose as bride and groom - it would add variety to your portfolio and give you (pressure-free) experience working with such things as shooting a white wedding dress to capture all its detail under a variety of lighting conditions.
On a related note I would go through and selectively cut down the number of images you're displaying. For one thing it's better to show an approximately equal number of photos from each shoot (until you have enough shoots to be very selective and only show one or two). Looking at this great disparity I worry that you had one portrait shoot which went really well and one in which you were lucky to get away with three keepers. (That may not be true, but as a potential paying customer I'd like more confidence that I'm getting my money's worth.) Also, there are several cases in which you have several very similar shots. Pick one and remove the rest. For example, you lead your landscapes section with three shots of the same starfish (and follow that up with a triptych of those same three shots). You'd be better served by picking your favorite (or the one which works best with the other shots in that section) and removing the other two and the triptych.
Also in terms of presentation to a potential customer you should think about your branding and presenting a consistent feel to your images. I see three distinct styles in your portrait section. The first shoot is presented both with a softer, pastel color palette as well as an antiqued look, while the second shoot has very bold, saturated colors. Each of these treatments works, but as a potential customer I'd wonder how my photos will turn out. Perhaps you plan to intentionally present this variety to show your range and will discuss the final effect with clients up front, and that's fine. That's why I'm suggesting thinking about using a more consistent feel rather than just saying "pick one".
Lastly, just in terms of first impressions, I do like the image you have selected for your front portfolio page. I would strongly suggest reordering the wedding section images, however. Yes, to some extent a wedding photo package is supposed to tell a story, but that does not mean your presentation here should be strictly chronological. You want to lead with your best, most-clearly-a-wedding-keeper photo. The groom headshot could be any guy in a suit. In my opinion the strongest in the bunch is the couple kissing on the beach (currently second shot in the sixth row).
![[No title]](/data/xfmg/thumbnail/31/31980-e5048a424621c7b3cd0d306d63c09d67.jpg?1734160756)
![[No title]](/data/xfmg/thumbnail/31/31709-79016edd1a9f5ea41ef60f546bd0236d.jpg?1734160386)
![[No title]](/data/xfmg/thumbnail/31/31708-69f4ec98ec000d4fc9a9a1cc282e8e16.jpg?1734160384)
