What's new

Self Portraits C&C please

You got me on the hat....However, I think I got you on the facial expression.

Yea.. I agree, your face is much goofier! lol!

I was trying to carry that hat more or less straight... with no extra goofiness... (those that know me will know what I mean! I have a really strange sense of humor!)
 
I really like #2 it's got character and it made me smile and I really really needed to smile :). I'm also digging Charlies cat hat self picture smiing guys thank you :)!!
 
I'm liking that second shot as well. I like your Catholic Mass analogy as well. Thanks for the smile!
 
Wow... there is a big increase of self portraits in the last few days. People must be getting less busy. I think the background light was too powerful.
 
I really like #2 it's got character and it made me smile and I really really needed to smile :). I'm also digging Charlies cat hat self picture smiing guys thank you :)!!

Well I'm glad I was able to make you smile...that was the goal.

I'm liking that second shot as well. I like your Catholic Mass analogy as well. Thanks for the smile!

No problem man.

Wow... there is a big increase of self portraits in the last few days. People must be getting less busy. I think the background light was too powerful.

Its cold outside....no one has anything to do (at least where I'm at). I think you are right. The background is too powerful. I really wanted it blown but I think its blown a tad too much.
 
Catholic mass lmao! I thought the same doing mine!! I do have a remote trigger but I'm pretty sure Angus has stolen it and I can't find his stash (we found his first stash of stolen items under the drier when we moved lol).

I like the first but love the second, what a great carefree capture, well done for your first time, it's tricky!!
 
Take this with a grain of salt since I do not have white background. All I have is gray. If you already have white background, you probably dont really need to add light to the background. If you do, you don't need much. You just have to make sure you are not casting shadow on the background. More than likely you will have pure white anyway. I think the light to the background bounced back and hit your camera. That is why it looks a little low in contrast.

Now if you are shooting on a gray background like me, that is when you really need the background light to make the background look white. So if I want white, add light. If I want black, I block the light hitting the background. If I want gray, add light a little. I didnt do it to the extreme.. but you get the idea. These are both shot with same gray background. I could have made the background more powerful on the 2nd one and get pure white.

228363_4941320615559_962048319_n.jpg


469384_4259888500182_752524228_o.jpg
 
Take this with a grain of salt since I do not have white background. All I have is gray. If you already have white background, you probably dont really need to add light to the background. If you do, you don't need much. You just have to make sure you are not casting shadow on the background. More than likely you will have pure white anyway. I think the light to the background bounced back and hit your camera. That is why it looks a little low in contrast.

Now if you are shooting on a gray background like me, that is when you really need the background light to make the background look white. So if I want white, add light. If I want black, I block the light hitting the background. If I want gray, add light a little. I didnt do it to the extreme.. but you get the idea. These are both shot with same gray background. I could have made the background more powerful on the 2nd one and get pure white.

228363_4941320615559_962048319_n.jpg


469384_4259888500182_752524228_o.jpg

That second one is one sexy man beast.

Yeah I think you are totally right. I need to reduce the amount of light on the background in order to avoid the contrast loss. I was definitely getting flare from the light bouncing off the background.

Thanks for the help.
 
Catholic mass lmao! I thought the same doing mine!! I do have a remote trigger but I'm pretty sure Angus has stolen it and I can't find his stash (we found his first stash of stolen items under the drier when we moved lol).

I like the first but love the second, what a great carefree capture, well done for your first time, it's tricky!!

Thanks so much. I'm not such a big fan of being in front of the camera but lately its been hard to convince/demand my wife be my model. So there will probably (unfortunately for you guys) be more self portraits in my future.
 
Take this with a grain of salt since I do not have white background. All I have is gray. If you already have white background, you probably dont really need to add light to the background. If you do, you don't need much. You just have to make sure you are not casting shadow on the background. More than likely you will have pure white anyway. I think the light to the background bounced back and hit your camera. That is why it looks a little low in contrast.

Now if you are shooting on a gray background like me, that is when you really need the background light to make the background look white. So if I want white, add light. If I want black, I block the light hitting the background. If I want gray, add light a little. I didnt do it to the extreme.. but you get the idea. These are both shot with same gray background. I could have made the background more powerful on the 2nd one and get pure white.

228363_4941320615559_962048319_n.jpg


469384_4259888500182_752524228_o.jpg

That second one is one sexy man beast.

Yeah I think you are totally right. I need to reduce the amount of light on the background in order to avoid the contrast loss. I was definitely getting flare from the light bouncing off the background.

Thanks for the help.

Um, I know I've been gone for awhile but did you lose your password to your other account or something? I was used to your other name. I thought it was clever and funny. Well, now that I know your real name. You can know mine: Craig Myran
 
Take this with a grain of salt since I do not have white background. All I have is gray. If you already have white background, you probably dont really need to add light to the background. If you do, you don't need much. You just have to make sure you are not casting shadow on the background. More than likely you will have pure white anyway. I think the light to the background bounced back and hit your camera. That is why it looks a little low in contrast.

Now if you are shooting on a gray background like me, that is when you really need the background light to make the background look white. So if I want white, add light. If I want black, I block the light hitting the background. If I want gray, add light a little. I didnt do it to the extreme.. but you get the idea. These are both shot with same gray background. I could have made the background more powerful on the 2nd one and get pure white.

That second one is one sexy man beast.

Yeah I think you are totally right. I need to reduce the amount of light on the background in order to avoid the contrast loss. I was definitely getting flare from the light bouncing off the background.

Thanks for the help.

Um, I know I've been gone for awhile but did you lose your password to your other account or something? I was used to your other name. I thought it was clever and funny. Well, now that I know your real name. You can know mine: Craig Myran

Robin was wanting to change the ID on the old account, and the mods could not accommodate him. With his business growing so much, it was time to go with something more professional then SchwettyLens... you can definitely understand that, right? So he started a new account...
 
Yes, I can certainly understand that. That's too bad about the account name not being able to change. He certainly has a professional name and one that will be unique enough to remember. A big portrait photographer in town is named Bob Smith. Well there happens to be two others with the same name in the area that, while not doing it as long, take portraits as well. So its always funny to hear someone say they're having Bob Smith do their portraits and most assume its the main guy and then when the photos are shown, at first I was like, THAT was done by Bob Smith??? Nope, some other guy.

Now take the name Robinson Usagani. Not only is it a beautiful name, it sounds like one of those photographers that get their work known by people worldwide. I hope that will be the case with sweaty lens.
 
Yes, I can certainly understand that. That's too bad about the account name not being able to change. He certainly has a professional name and one that will be unique enough to remember. A big portrait photographer in town is named Bob Smith. Well there happens to be two others with the same name in the area that, while not doing it as long, take portraits as well. So its always funny to hear someone say they're having Bob Smith do their portraits and most assume its the main guy and then when the photos are shown, at first I was like, THAT was done by Bob Smith??? Nope, some other guy.

Now take the name Robinson Usagani. Not only is it a beautiful name, it sounds like one of those photographers that get their work known by people worldwide. I hope that will be the case with sweaty lens.

You sound like you got a little bromance going on....
 
Will you be the photographer at our brotacular wedding? You will shoot for free right?
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom