Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
really very nice, great with those clouds and the light patterns in the trees are the added touch.
But I agree with some others that the FG appears dark, if you have luminosity layers you could try to play around with either bringing up the darks a tad, or even increasing the rim lighting on the trees which should have a similar effect of more dynamic range down there, more eye candy. If you have NIK bundle you should be able to do something similar with Viveza if your careful with where you place your adjustment point.
If you want me to play with it, feel free to PM me the flickr link. Really a stunning shot.
I hate the crop ratio . It is a landscape.. do 2:1 width to height ratio or something. You made it even narrower than your standard file. I think i like it better if you just crop it just below the mountain showing just a little bit of the trees. Keep the whole width, throw away most of the trees at the bottom.
Lightened up a bit for C&C... It really is much lighter and much more detailed in PS here, than it is on TPF or Flickr, but I worked on the FG a bit to see what you think...
View attachment 10789
Lightened up a bit for C&C... It really is much lighter and much more detailed in PS here, than it is on TPF or Flickr, but I worked on the FG a bit to see what you think...
Better, may need to mask in a higher exposure (assuming you took one). Lots and lots of lost data/ detail in the trees. Hopefully you got more than one exposure, although the D800 should be fine to lift some more detail out of those shadows (to an extent).
Here is the crop as suggested by Robin (Schwettylens)
Na, not feeling this one! The rolling hills and the shapes of the tree are very strong supporting elements.
Na, not feeling this one! The rolling hills and the shapes of the tree are very strong supporting elements.
Lightened up a bit for C&C... It really is much lighter and much more detailed in PS here, than it is on TPF or Flickr, but I worked on the FG a bit to see what you think...
Better, may need to mask in a higher exposure (assuming you took one). Lots and lots of lost data/ detail in the trees. Hopefully you got more than one exposure, although the D800 should be fine to lift some more detail out of those shadows (to an extent).
Here is the crop as suggested by Robin (Schwettylens)
Na, not feeling this one! The rolling hills and the shapes of the tree are very strong supporting elements.
I actually did nine frame brackets, 2/3 stop between them. So I do have the exposures. BUT.. on my "calibrated" monitor... the shot looks good... doesn't need lightening. I wish you could see it! lol! So anything I do along those lines, is strictly for web viewing. I am amazed by the detail in the photos.. the D800 is truly in a class of it's own.
Yes.. I prefer the 11x14 format also.....
Thanks for the comments!
pay no attention to Schwetty. Fauxtographers just don't know.
I agree, gipson. Keep the standard aspect ratio, the dark trees give the mountain life.
pay no attention to Schwetty. Fauxtographers just don't know.
I agree, gipson. Keep the standard aspect ratio, the dark trees give the mountain life.