The biggest problem I see on this forum is that we are dealing with a lot of photographers who do not make a living from photography.
The gear is paid by some other, way more profitable job. So that not really getting paid for a photo is no big deal. Great for you people.
Not so great for the true photographers.
I typed a very long, incredibly insightful, possibly emotional, response. Fortunately, I also followed my #1 rule of posting online--THINK before you post. So I deleted it all.
But I will say this:
First, I'm a bit confused as to whether you are one of these "true" photographers you mention. In another thread, you state "I'm working on my painting. From what I see here there is no way I will ever make money from photo." So, I'm not sure what to think.
Second, are you saying that to be a "true" photographer, I must not only charge, but I must charge an amount that is acceptable to...who, exactly? You? Other "true" photographers? Who is setting the standard here? Does what I charge have to pay for my gear? So, if I use a bridge camera, I can charge less and still be a "true" photographer?
And finally--and let's not lose sight of this--the guy wasn't even willing to PAY the paltry $50!! Why? BECAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE TO!! EVEN if he doesn't do something unethical, like using a photo without permission--he will most likely find someone with a photo who will be MORE than happy to just let him use it. And THAT is the competition the lower-end photographer faces these days. So, if you can manage to make $50 for a photo you already took, without any real effort on your part? Sorry but this chick is going to take that job All. Day. Long.
And I will NOT give up my "True Photographer" ID card because I let someone pay me $50 for a photo.
(Yes, believe it or not, the first response was far longer than this).