Furthermore, I thought you said you gave up and weren't going to follow my posts or even going to post anymore on my threads? To make it easier on me and everyone else on this thread please don't follow or post. Thank You
You are the source of your own drama. Stop posting things like this and it will go away.
C&C as requested:
#1 There is a LOT going on here... I count 6 vehicles, a few trees, a house, a garage, random things sitting on the lawn.... the composition seems completely random. Other than it's level, there appears to be no rhyme or reason to the shot. What in this shot were you drawn to? Isolate that and leave out the rest.
#2 Strictly compositionally speaking, it's not bad. There are two trucks, and they are "organized" in the photo... it makes sense and is easy to digest. To tighten it up, I would crop out most of the black space around the edges. Of course, the scene itself has a HUGE dynamic range so there is no way your going to properly expose it all. I see that you took this shot in Manual... what did you meter on? I probably would have exposed for the truck bodies and let the lights blow out more.
#3 This is a photo of a stop sign stuck through the roof of a cop car. Let's pretend it's not there. Why include the trailer house? I don't see any link to the photo. I know what you're going to say already.... "that was where the fire was, it is integral to the photo". But it's not because there isn't any fire coming out of it. As far as any viewer is concerned, it's just a random building. You could have shot lower and used it as a backdrop to outline the form of the car or not include it at all.
Photographing a black glossy car at night with nothing but an on-camera flash with no ambient light on it is going to be nigh impossible. Try to position yourself so it has some lights reflecting off the finish. The on-camera flash works well enough to illuminate the white paint.... albeit not gracefully, but better than no flash.
#4 I think this is a nicer comp than #1. It's simple, understandable. However, the same exposure issues are the problem here. ISO 100 isn't going to cut it. Bump that up to 400 or maybe even 800. You'll need to balance between noise level and exposure. It's going to be a compromise as most journalistic type photography is.
The bottom line is that we need to see at least the outlines of these vehicles, and some detail in the tires/wheels... otherwise they could be floating through outerspace.
So my talking points for next time would be....
1. Expose for the subject.
2. Avoid wide "scene" shots for now. Focus on tight simple compositions.
3. Watch out for too much black space.
I look foward to seeing your progress.