mc1979
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2011
- Messages
- 270
- Reaction score
- 52
- Location
- Al
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Ok, I'm going to leave all the artsy-fartsy talk for others.
To the OP, I think your photography is great. I have been to your site and really liked all your work. I love the images you have posted in this thread. I understand your thought process behind the project and I think you did an excellent job of execution.
However, I didn't like your comments that seemed to suggest that you feel like if you had taken shots of unattractive people that you wouldn't have pulled this off. I understand this to a degree.. my way of thinking is if they are gorgeous people, it's kind of hard to take a "bad" photograph. Now I know that you could still take a technically bad photograph of a beautiful person, but your average joe who hasn't studied all the aspects of what makes a good image a good image, is just going to see a beautiful person, and say "oh great" And with this project, they are all great looking people, but I think that's what others might have meant when they were commenting in what you think was a negative manner. It's like looking through a fashion magazine..you see so many beautiful people, that unless the photographer really steps out of the box and gets creative....it just becomes another pretty face.
With the second series you posted, I felt a connection more with these people. These people seem even more relaxed with you. They all have more "character" in my opinion. You found the beauty in these "average-joes" from the wrinkles to the missing teeth. Their pictures seem to tell more of a story to me. These have more of a "stranger, captured street-style" feel to me.
Anyhow, that's just my opinion, and you know what they say about those..I think your assertion, that if it had been all ugly people, we would not have been as interested...is completely wrong.
To the OP, I think your photography is great. I have been to your site and really liked all your work. I love the images you have posted in this thread. I understand your thought process behind the project and I think you did an excellent job of execution.
However, I didn't like your comments that seemed to suggest that you feel like if you had taken shots of unattractive people that you wouldn't have pulled this off. I understand this to a degree.. my way of thinking is if they are gorgeous people, it's kind of hard to take a "bad" photograph. Now I know that you could still take a technically bad photograph of a beautiful person, but your average joe who hasn't studied all the aspects of what makes a good image a good image, is just going to see a beautiful person, and say "oh great" And with this project, they are all great looking people, but I think that's what others might have meant when they were commenting in what you think was a negative manner. It's like looking through a fashion magazine..you see so many beautiful people, that unless the photographer really steps out of the box and gets creative....it just becomes another pretty face.
With the second series you posted, I felt a connection more with these people. These people seem even more relaxed with you. They all have more "character" in my opinion. You found the beauty in these "average-joes" from the wrinkles to the missing teeth. Their pictures seem to tell more of a story to me. These have more of a "stranger, captured street-style" feel to me.
Anyhow, that's just my opinion, and you know what they say about those..I think your assertion, that if it had been all ugly people, we would not have been as interested...is completely wrong.

