The problem is this [IMO], so many new users have come here and they post that they have just bought their first camera and pretty much ask how to use it and then they post that thread and move on to give C&C on other people's photos when they've just admitted they don't know anything.
where on the forum has this occurred? and is there more than one
instance of it, per hundred or even per thousand posts?
and what is outrageous about about a novice saying..
i like this/i dont like that.
i think in art (subject photography), this is about all you can say!
the statements 'that is good', 'that is bad'. belongs to establishment
Art Salon of the 1800's. if people are crap photographers in your view,
just ignore them. or be charitable and find something positive to say.
we can sit using photo.net 'rate photos' all day, giving 1 for aestethic
and 1 for originality.let it out!! :0)
Unfortuneately, many times these people are saying "great job" to a photo by another newbie [when the photo is actually quite bad] and then that newbie thinks -"oh, hey! This is great, they liked it, I'm not as bad as I thought I was and continues on the same course without ever improving.
this seems to me to be based on assumptions, generalisations.
who is this newbie and how is it possible to read this newbie's mind?
it assumes that this newbie is stimulated and motivated
only by some 'supervisor', here on the forum who operates
this newbie as if by remote-control.
how can it asserted that the person will continue to make identical
copies of the picture that disgusted you until 're-programmed' by
criticism and how it can be asserted that they will 'never improve'
unless 'an expert' acts as a catalyst for advancement (advancement
compatible with the 'experts' values and beliefs)?
i just think the stance of a pact is absolutist. everything can be improved,
including this 'manifesto' which contains (in DRAFT form) several
'will not/can not/shall not' type statements. in using negative dialogue,
these don't actually mean anything tangible. 'i will not' doesn't inform
anyone what a person WILL.
e.g "i will not eat soup for lunch"
so..do we know what will be eaten for lunch?
no.
so, what WILL the pact do?
and is it useful? ecologically sound in terms of a group dynamic..and
what is the desired outcome. and when is this outcome to be achieved?
and how do we know when it has been achieved?
and what do we do then?