I have a Bogen-Manfrotto legs and both ball and pan-tilt heads. Sorry, I don't have model numbers on any three pieces and I'm too lazy to go and dig the thing out right now. I bought the outfit roughly ten years ago and while it's really solid and well-crafted, it's also heavy, which is why it needs to be dug out from where it's collecting dust. It was a
B&H buy and probably then cost around $190.
My thoughts may run counter to prevailing conventional wisdom on the importance of tripods. I simply don't think that they are
THAT crucial to your photography. Sorry, I simply do not, at least for my personal applications. FWIW, I worked with a pro photog about three weeks ago on a shoot and he was using a $30 'pod that I think he said came from WalMart, or was it KMart? No kidding. He said he had no use for anything more expensive, he'd rather put this money into something else.
I'd say anything that will reliably support your camera's weight is adequate, but that is, again, solely my opinion. And the weight of the tripod is even more important. I did some hiking a month or so ago and although I could easily see the advantage of a tripod, the thought of lugging mine along just didn't work for me.
What's about the lightest you can get nowadays? I wouldn't mind knowing. Thanks!