What's new

What do/don't you like about TPF?

I agree. I posted photos not many could even understand-- so they made these comments-- SEE THE CITY LANDSCAPE FORUM -- READ MY THREADS- me being from Philly, i can go in as far as need be and I take no crap. They got offended, claiming I was to critical of opinions- one even said i must be high-- ones feelings got hurt when i told him he needs to stop selling his service upon this forum- his logo posted so shamelessly large- check it out -- here's an experiment-- how many people would say a black dot on a white canvas is art? who's opinion is correct? THE GUY WHO PAID MILLIONS FOR IT. People love teaching and saying their opinion. Some do it well- I like that- But I see an Ahole- a mile away and deal with them accordingly. They could crush the spirit of many and make them quit for ever. I always went after the school yard bully. and i still do. P.S. I got with them so much administrator locked the thread. I COULD CARE LESS WHAT THEY LIKE- I JUST WANT THE VIEWER TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT I SAW- IF THE SEE MY REASON FOR SHOOTING GREAT- IF NOT GREAT- BUT I WILL BE DAMNED IF I WILL LET PEOPLE TELL ME I DIDN'T SHOOT IT RIGHT (EXCEPT FOR ISO/F STOP/SHUTTER ETC). PEOPLES EMOTION IS NEVER WRONG. THEY didn't comment on the tech aspect of the photos but the fact they thought the shot should nothing. Understanding is not the job of the photographer- a photo to TRY TO understand is. cheers mate-- 0_* click!
 
try this one - for shadow shot (avatar) something of the self should be revealed for us to consider what is not. The subject doesn't hide in the shadows (and troll the site to make comments as if he actual know about things like shadow shots. 0_* click
 
I agree. I posted photos not many could even understand-- so they made these comments-- SEE THE CITY LANDSCAPE FORUM -- READ MY THREADS- me being from Philly, i can go in as far as need be and I take no crap. They got offended, claiming I was to critical of opinions- one even said i must be high-- ones feelings got hurt when i told him he needs to stop selling his service upon this forum- his logo posted so shamelessly large- check it out -- here's an experiment-- how many people would say a black dot on a white canvas is art? who's opinion is correct? THE GUY WHO PAID MILLIONS FOR IT. People love teaching and saying their opinion. Some do it well- I like that- But I see an Ahole- a mile away and deal with them accordingly. They could crush the spirit of many and make them quit for ever. I always went after the school yard bully. and i still do. P.S. I got with them so much administrator locked the thread. I COULD CARE LESS WHAT THEY LIKE- I JUST WANT THE VIEWER TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT I SAW- IF THE SEE MY REASON FOR SHOOTING GREAT- IF NOT GREAT- BUT I WILL BE DAMNED IF I WILL LET PEOPLE TELL ME I DIDN'T SHOOT IT RIGHT (EXCEPT FOR ISO/F STOP/SHUTTER ETC). PEOPLES EMOTION IS NEVER WRONG. THEY didn't comment on the tech aspect of the photos but the fact they thought the shot should nothing. Understanding is not the job of the photographer- a photo to TRY TO understand is. cheers mate-- 0_* click!

The issue is that people will never see exactly what you saw. You were looking at a 3D space with an imaging device that is much more advanced than the best digital camera (your eyes). You have to make them feel what you felt, as opposed to trying to get them to see what you saw by in-camera replication of the scene.
 
try this one - for shadow shot (avatar) something of the self should be revealed for us to consider what is not. The subject doesn't hide in the shadows (and troll the site to make comments as if he actual know about things like shadow shots. 0_* click
Huh? Come again?
 
That's what she said!!
 
The open forums are not the place to air grievances with members. If you have problems with members you must use the report post feature (small triangle with a ! in the middle located in the bottom left corner of a profile just beside their post) and fill in a report form for the moderators to deal with. Do not attempt to "fight" with other users yourself.

If you do not wish for critique on your photos you must use the "Just for Fun" gallery in the galleries section. All other galleries on the site are open to critique by users; whilst Just for Fun is specifically there just to show your work without any critique being offered.

Here endeth the mods message.
 
try this one - for shadow shot (avatar) something of the self should be revealed for us to consider what is not. The subject doesn't hide in the shadows (and troll the site to make comments as if he actual know about things like shadow shots. 0_* click
Huh? Come again?

I think the lady from the mean streets of philly is trying to say she doesn't like my avatar.
 
A... pizza party?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The primary thing I dislike about TPF (and this certainly isn't unique to TPF) is the vast number of people who, when they post, write nonsense which is completely devoid of value. These are people who, statistically, lack basic social skills and believe that their presence on an internet forum is the equivalent of "having a life". These are people who are incapable of saying anything constructive, and prefer to be mean and rude in a sad attempt to, in their own pointed little heads, justify their pitiful existence.

They're also the same people who will take exception to this post...
 
The primary thing I dislike about TPF (and this certainly isn't unique to TPF) is the vast number of people who, when they post, write nonsense which is completely devoid of value. These are people who, statistically, lack basic social skills and believe that their presence on an internet forum is the equivalent of "having a life". These are people who are incapable of saying anything constructive, and prefer to be mean and rude in a sad attempt to, in their own pointed little heads, justify their pitiful existence.

They're also the same people who will take exception to this post...

Goddammit!
 
You just don't understand my text, man.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom