No, the moon should have been bigger. Longer focal length would make the moon larger and and shallower depth of field, if the roof is large enough.
Yes, 101th time I have told you lol. Well, if you go farther and zoom in (vs closer with wider angle), you will isolate the background more because you viewing angle is smaller. So in this case you could have made the tower bigger. You will also notice the subject body will be more flattering. Right now her legs look like you shot it facing down so you see distortion a bit.
What do you all mean by longer focal length? I should have zoomed in?
SabrinaO said:
YEAH BABY!!!! Now THAT looks hot.
It is and isnt... if she had taken this with a 35 the space needle would have not even been visible it would have been like a dot.... she probably also backed up some to get this in the 2nd one, making the background more oof.
Now it's not missing anything, and if you keep an open mind and assume it was not taken on planet earth it does not look photoshopped either... sorry messing around with photoshop tonight had to do it.![]()