2WheelPhoto
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2011
- Messages
- 6,844
- Reaction score
- 996
- Location
- Tampa
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
It impresses the ladies...
It impresses the ladies...
Oh... I thought it was the size of the lens that did that...
I have seen some photographers carried 2 to 3 DLSR cameras.
that's not 'so many'. I am surprised that the "classic" shot of an over-burdened photographer has not yet been posted or linked to in this thread. SO, here it is, followed by two other examples of multi-camera shooters!
http://photopostsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/funny-photographers3.jpg
funny-photographers.jpg
http://www.photographyabdu.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/funny-photographers-job-01.jpg
Is that KR?
The kneepads, the duct taped tele hoods, the golf shoes, and a bottle of vidicon in the somewhere for the back pain!Well, here is the "classic one"...b12e498299cc.jpg
Also I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that for many photography jobs you always need to have a spare with you in case your main camera breaks down (Im talking about big events, like weddings and such)
Yep. I intend to add a full frame to my collection soon for this reason (currently using the Canon 7D and a crappy point-and-shoot panasonic). This is especially true when switching between super zoomy and wide angle lenses.Grabbing another camera is quicker than swapping lenses.
Rawlins said:Here is a simple equation to explain it all.
C=(N+1)
It can also be rewritten as:
C=(S-1)
C=Amount of cameras you should have.
N=Amount of cameras you currently have.
S=Amount of cameras that will force your wife to separate from you.
This works for many things! (Like computer games, bicycles, and hookers)![]()