Wideangle needed with 17-55?

Val

TPF Noob!
Joined
Dec 16, 2007
Messages
161
Reaction score
0
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Right now im using 18-200, but will be switching to 17-55 and 70-200. Im also contemplating the need for 12-24.


The thing is that now i tend to think that i dont. For really wide creative shots ive got 10.5mm fisheye. 18mm is mostly wide enough for normal use. Usually i find i need wider view for landscapes/cityscapes. But you can always take a few pics and stitch them into panorama. You can even do it for moving subjects! Just take central pic of the subject, wait till it goes away and take other pics for pano.



There are obviously advantages and disadvantages to both approaches, but 12-24 aint cheap and it bugs me to change lenses.



What do you think?
 

Big Mike

I am Big, I am Mike
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2003
Messages
33,896
Reaction score
1,853
Location
Edmonton
Website
www.mikehodson.ca
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
The 12-24mm is rectilinear...not fish-eye. So if you want really wide, but not with the fish-eye distortion, then the 12-24mm might be a good choice.
 

keith204

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
1,643
Reaction score
2
Location
Bolivar, MO
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
have you looked into the Sigma?

I haven't tried it, but people seem to like it for the price. Also 10mm is quite a bit more than 12mm when you're getting that wide.

The Sigma is probably the one I will be getting when I can rationalize it.
 

Antithesis

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
1,340
Reaction score
16
Location
Caribbean
Website
www.epanderson.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
If you were contemplating the sigma 10-20, I'd say it'd be worth it, but going from 17 to 12 doesn't really justify the expense as you wouldn't be missing many shots because of it. Keep in mind that the sigma will run you about half the price of the Nikon, and will be nearly as sharp.

If your just looking at the Nikon 12-24, I'd say it's not really worth it.
 

S2K1

TPF Noob!
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
Location
Utah
I'll also throw in that you might want to look at the Sigma 10-20.
 

Garbz

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
Oct 26, 2003
Messages
9,713
Reaction score
203
Location
Brisbane, Australia
Website
www.auer.garbz.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
Save it up and put it as a downpayment of a house. You claim yourself you don't really need it.
 

TheOtherBob

TPF Noob!
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
289
Reaction score
2
Location
UWS, NY, NY
Website
www.flickr.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
I think I'd say that if you don't have a wide angle, you'll never miss it -- but if you ever do have a wide angle, you'll never know what you did without one. I love mine - and use it constantly (sometimes even as a walkaround lens).

10 and 17 don't sound that far apart - but I see a real difference between the Canon 10-22 and a 17-85 lens. Maybe one of the more tech-savy people here can answer -- is the difference between 10 and 17 greater somehow than the difference between, say, 70 and 77? It seems like it to me, but that could just be my imagination.
 

dipstick

TPF Noob!
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Yes, the difference between 10 and 17 is quite big! I have both the 17-55 and the 12-24, and the 5mm extra at the wide end is very often what I need to get the shot I want when working indoors or in other places where space is limited.

The difference between 10 and 17 is greater than the difference than 70 and 77. The difference between 10 and 17 is 1.7x, while he difference between 70 and 77 is only 1.1x. If you multiply 70 with 1.7 you will get 119.

So the difference between a 10mm and a 17mm would be as big as the difference between a 70mm and a 119mm.
 

TheOtherBob

TPF Noob!
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
289
Reaction score
2
Location
UWS, NY, NY
Website
www.flickr.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
The difference between 10 and 17 is greater than the difference than 70 and 77. The difference between 10 and 17 is 1.7x, while he difference between 70 and 77 is only 1.1x. If you multiply 70 with 1.7 you will get 119.

Thanks! - that makes perfect sense now that I think about it.
 

sabbath999

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
69
Location
Missouri
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
BTW most people who have 10mm wide lenses don't know how to use them. Not saying that about people posting on this thread, I just see a lot of really bad pictures taken with ultrawide lenses... more so than most other kinds of lenses.
 

doobs

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
566
Reaction score
0
Location
Sacramento, CA
Website
flickr.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
BTW most people who have 10mm wide lenses don't know how to use them. Not saying that about people posting on this thread, I just see a lot of really bad pictures taken with ultrawide lenses... more so than most other kinds of lenses.

How do you mean?
 

Alex_B

No longer a newbie, moving up!
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
14,491
Reaction score
206
Location
Europe 67.51°N
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
BTW most people who have 10mm wide lenses don't know how to use them. Not saying that about people posting on this thread, I just see a lot of really bad pictures taken with ultrawide lenses... more so than most other kinds of lenses.

I second that.

shooting really wide requires also myself to think more about composition and the angle i point my camera towards the scene.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Top