Honestly, all those in Camera processing features on the Sony make me shy away from it... the 3D stuff, the HDR, panoramas... all of that can be done with software for free. If I'm paying however much for a camera, I want the company to spend that money on the stuff that makes it a good camera, not on extra features that seem useless on a tiny LCD anyway. I've never used a Sony camera, so I won't speak about the quality. But I've used other stuff from them (computers, stereos, etc...) and they seem bent on "bling" factor. Lots of extra features on every single device, most of which I'd never use... In the stereos this meant the amplifier itself was cheap and didn't sound as good as the competition. In the computers it meant cheaper components were used so that they could use more of them. You know what I mean? Like I said, I've never used Sony cameras, but, Nikon and Canon are camera companies, no matter how hard they try, Sony still feels like gadget company. I dunno, ymmv