Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes. Being a full frame body the 5D can't use EF-S lenses because of the way the EF-S lenses are designed.The canon 5d mark 1 uses only EF lenses???
Canon makes 4 different '70-200mm' lenses. All are in the 'L' series...so they are top of the line.
70-200 F4
70-200 F4 IS
70-200 F2.8
70-200 F2.8 IS
What is your budget?
I'd recommend one of the F2.8 versions because you can get shallower DOF with them....but also consider that they are really heavy lenses. The F4 versions are still tack sharp and great lenses.Oh gosh....well which one would be better for the fashion world?
Yes, these ones are white. All of Canon's telephoto L lenses are white. I think the original reason was that white was to keep them cooler when used outdoors in bright sunlight, as too much heat could affect the finely tuned parts of the lens. However, I think a bigger reason they are still white, is that it makes them easily recognizable. LINKOh are these the lenses that are white? Is there a reason why they are white?
These high quality lenses are built like tanks, so they are usually in good condition when you buy them used. But also consider than some of them get a lot of use and abuse from pros and you may not want one that has been put through the ringer.At first I had still planned on maybe buying these things used to start out but financing is always an option. LOL
That's true...and many people go for the F4 version....but just about every professional I know, has a 70-200 F.8 lens of some sort.Well I'll probably buy new then. I've been looking at a few on ebay. Boy there is such a price jump from the f/4 to the f/2.8. We're talking hundreds like someone said earlier in this post. You can get a 4 looks like for maybe 500 or less on ebay. but we are talking 15/1600 for the 2.8
It'll be better when you're shooting in natural light. If you're going to be using studio lighting most of the time then the f/4.0 would be fine, but it won't have the extra shallow DOF the f/2.8 would have.So will the 2.8 still be better then the 4?