fjrabon
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 3,644
- Reaction score
- 754
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
No, by 'original' I mean the image first posted. I admit that this might be a bit confusing, since 'original' could also mean the earliest possible version or something, but in this case it doesn't mean that and it's frankly unreasonable to assume that it does since a) 'original' is largely meaningless in that sense in this age of digital cameras and b) the image in post #5 has obvious flaws.
Yeah, the original was shot with a prime lens, and I was behind a steel fence shooting in, so from the very beginning I knew there would be quite a bit of cropping, because I knew I wanted to ideally be a little closer in. Additionally, I wanted the background in, and it got blown out pretty quickly if you exposed the statue much more brightly. I had a shot with the primary statue exposed brighter, but the statue of the drinking boy had a lot of blowouts and lost detail then, so I stopped down 2/3rds of a stop, knowing that would still give me some room to dodge up the primary subject.
In retrospect I might have done this as a very mild HDR, but I almost never think about doing HDR when I'm in the field, and I was shooting handheld and I always lose sharpness when I shoot HDR handheld. way more than I like, no matter what program I use for it.
Last edited: