What exactly does that mean? I agree with Jeff - the lighting is very flat and less than exciting, and combine with the fact that the child's skin tone is very similar to the background wall... It's not a bad shot...I have been working hard on finding and harnessing natural light....
Looks pretty darn cute. When I maximize the photo, it looks soft. It may be the forum compression flaw or the photo isnt very sharp. If it is sharp though, it is a nice photo.
What exactly does that mean? I agree with Jeff - the lighting is very flat and less than exciting, and combine with the fact that the child's skin tone is very similar to the background wall... It's not a bad shot...I have been working hard on finding and harnessing natural light....
I have problems with depth......all my photos looks very flat. But I see all these photographers who do natural light and get very dimensional photos I'm working on it.
There is a severe hot-spot in the center of the images...which appears to have been caused by excessive burning-in of the border areas. The front edge of the basket is out of focus, which is visually distracting, and the bottom of the basket is cut off..and yet there is a huge amount of top-space above the baby (the space where the giant watermark is) AND you show us the fake baseboard running across the back,bottom of the photo. The baby's head also has no obvious support, and seems to be dangerously far across the rim of the basket. This shot uses the same basic props that most newborn natural light shooters are using: a basket,filled with stuffing, a sleeping baby, and then a small section of fake wooden flooring, a fake baseboard, and then a fake wallpaper backdrop. So, it has most all of the basic checkmarks, but the composition of the photo is a bit less than optimal, and the depth of field is shallow, and there's a hotspot and a major watermark that just really,really stands out.
I think toning down the hot spot would help a lot. I also think that showing the flooring/basket bottom juncture would make the shot feel "stronger"...with the bottom of the posing basket cropped off, but the FLOORING and baseboard shown, and then all that space above the baby, the "framing" of the shot is not optimal. i think if you work on this set more, it'll only get better and better!!! it is a pretty simple formula, with very standard props. On thing--that sharp,"pokey" piece of wicker on the basket...that is unsettling to me. You need a new basket.
Cute shot, but the washed out left side of basket and purple in the whites bother me more than the arguable lack of depth.
White balance, one might assume. I believe the hat's white is slightly more yellow than the blanket, plus where did you have the reflector? The blanket's direct light source maybe have been different (believe it or not) than the hat's. If the light from the reflector is going up, it will catch that blanket and not the hat as much because baby is hidden a little inside the basket.Cute shot, but the washed out left side of basket and purple in the whites bother me more than the arguable lack of depth.
I noticed the purple in the whites too....there is no purple anywhere in the house plus it didn't show up on the hat any idea what caused this?