- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 15,485
- Reaction score
- 7,878
- Location
- Central Florida
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Moderator 🛠️
- #61
Used Photography Cameras & Equipment - Buy and Sell Online
i also use B&H photo and Adorama sometimes
am I seeing this right? X-t20's for ~$700 on KEH?
I might have to get one too...
been thinking of upgrading ye olde X-E2. well, im keeping the X-E2 i was just thinking of an upgrade for our second fuji, the X-A1 (which the wife wont let me sell because she likes the blue color)
You people need to stop with this.
Between you and @SquarePeg and @jcdeboever and @nerwin, there's something in the water. (@Gary A. is the primary suspect.)
I can't afford to have two systems. But y'all are slowly wearing me down. But I'm impatient, and I'd have to sell a lot of crap to be able to afford it. But I leave my D800 behind a lot.
No, Destin get the X-T20@Destin get the XT2.
no, I changed my mine, get the X-T2
no, maybe ...
Just get BOTH !!
No, Destin get the X-T20@Destin get the XT2.
no, I changed my mine, get the X-T2
no, maybe ...
Just get BOTH !!
Actually, this is not as silly as it may sound.
A heavy and light camera of the same system. Then you use whichever camera is appropriate for the shoot.
The logic is the same in other system
Even with the E-M1, I am looking at the E-M10 as an even lighter companion, some time in the future.
Get one camera now, then get the 2nd next year.
OK. you're buying different camera systems every year for whatever is appropriate for the shoot
yeah ...
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
No, Destin get the X-T20@Destin get the XT2.
no, I changed my mine, get the X-T2
no, maybe ...
Just get BOTH !!
Actually, this is not as silly as it may sound.
A heavy and light camera of the same system. Then you use whichever camera is appropriate for the shoot.
The logic is the same in other system
Even with the E-M1, I am looking at the E-M10 as an even lighter companion, some time in the future.
Get one camera now, then get the 2nd next year.
OK. you're buying different camera systems every year for whatever is appropriate for the shoot
yeah ...
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
No, Destin get the X-T20@Destin get the XT2.
no, I changed my mine, get the X-T2
no, maybe ...
Just get BOTH !!
Actually, this is not as silly as it may sound.
A heavy and light camera of the same system. Then you use whichever camera is appropriate for the shoot.
The logic is the same in other system
Even with the E-M1, I am looking at the E-M10 as an even lighter companion, some time in the future.
Get one camera now, then get the 2nd next year.
OK. you're buying different camera systems every year for whatever is appropriate for the shoot
yeah ...
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
You missed the point.
A jack of all trades is a mater of none.
If the camera is too heavy, it ends up staying on the shelf, and you take no pictures.
Been there, done that. So I know first-hand the results of not wanting to haul out the big heavy camera . . . no pictures.
YES, you get the gear that you need, and it is NOT excessive, if done correctly.
You don't get every camera in the Nikon line, to fit minor changes. In this case you get two cameras, on both ends of the line, the heavy 810 and light 610. or heavy 7200 and light 3400. They use the same lens system, so there is no effect there.
I chose to go to a different system (m43) for even more weight reduction, so I took the hit of a new system being incompatible with my existing system. However, the next camera in the progression is in that same m43 system, and all the m43 lenses will work on that camera as well.
If you are already on the bottom of the series, such as with a D610, there is no option within the series, and you do have to change systems from FX to DX to get lighter.
No, Destin get the X-T20@Destin get the XT2.
no, I changed my mine, get the X-T2
no, maybe ...
Just get BOTH !!
Actually, this is not as silly as it may sound.
A heavy and light camera of the same system. Then you use whichever camera is appropriate for the shoot.
The logic is the same in other system
Even with the E-M1, I am looking at the E-M10 as an even lighter companion, some time in the future.
Get one camera now, then get the 2nd next year.
OK. you're buying different camera systems every year for whatever is appropriate for the shoot
yeah ...
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
You missed the point.
A jack of all trades is a mater of none.
If the camera is too heavy, it ends up staying on the shelf, and you take no pictures.
Been there, done that. So I know first-hand the results of not wanting to haul out the big heavy camera . . . no pictures.
YES, you get the gear that you need, and it is NOT excessive, if done correctly.
You don't get every camera in the Nikon line, to fit minor changes. In this case you get two cameras, on both ends of the line, the heavy 810 and light 610. or heavy 7200 and light 3400. They use the same lens system, so there is no effect there.
I chose to go to a different system (m43) for even more weight reduction, so I took the hit of a new system being incompatible with my existing system. However, the next camera in the progression is in that same m43 system, and all the m43 lenses will work on that camera as well.
If you are already on the bottom of the series, such as with a D610, there is no option within the series, and you do have to change systems from FX to DX to get lighter.
OK, get a full frame camera and a 4/3 camera and APS-C camera and all the lenses .. and a cell phone camera
you've got it all covered ... until the next "progression"
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
No, Destin get the X-T20@Destin get the XT2.
no, I changed my mine, get the X-T2
no, maybe ...
Just get BOTH !!
Actually, this is not as silly as it may sound.
A heavy and light camera of the same system. Then you use whichever camera is appropriate for the shoot.
The logic is the same in other system
Even with the E-M1, I am looking at the E-M10 as an even lighter companion, some time in the future.
Get one camera now, then get the 2nd next year.
OK. you're buying different camera systems every year for whatever is appropriate for the shoot
yeah ...
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
You missed the point.
A jack of all trades is a mater of none.
If the camera is too heavy, it ends up staying on the shelf, and you take no pictures.
Been there, done that. So I know first-hand the results of not wanting to haul out the big heavy camera . . . no pictures.
YES, you get the gear that you need, and it is NOT excessive, if done correctly.
You don't get every camera in the Nikon line, to fit minor changes. In this case you get two cameras, on both ends of the line, the heavy 810 and light 610. or heavy 7200 and light 3400. They use the same lens system, so there is no effect there.
I chose to go to a different system (m43) for even more weight reduction, so I took the hit of a new system being incompatible with my existing system. However, the next camera in the progression is in that same m43 system, and all the m43 lenses will work on that camera as well.
If you are already on the bottom of the series, such as with a D610, there is no option within the series, and you do have to change systems from FX to DX to get lighter.
OK, get a full frame camera and a 4/3 camera and APS-C camera and all the lenses .. and a cell phone camera
you've got it all covered ... until the next "progression"
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
Hey, if someone has the money to do so and wants to own one of every camera on the market, who are we to tell them it’s a bad thing to do?
It’s not like I’m endlessly adding gear. I made a calculated decision to trade my current APS-C body for a small, lighter one that better suits my needs. The sale entirely covered the cost.
Not that I need to justify my spending to a stranger on the Internet...
No, Destin get the X-T20@Destin get the XT2.
no, I changed my mine, get the X-T2
no, maybe ...
Just get BOTH !!
Actually, this is not as silly as it may sound.
A heavy and light camera of the same system. Then you use whichever camera is appropriate for the shoot.
The logic is the same in other system
Even with the E-M1, I am looking at the E-M10 as an even lighter companion, some time in the future.
Get one camera now, then get the 2nd next year.
OK. you're buying different camera systems every year for whatever is appropriate for the shoot
yeah ...
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
You missed the point.
A jack of all trades is a mater of none.
If the camera is too heavy, it ends up staying on the shelf, and you take no pictures.
Been there, done that. So I know first-hand the results of not wanting to haul out the big heavy camera . . . no pictures.
YES, you get the gear that you need, and it is NOT excessive, if done correctly.
You don't get every camera in the Nikon line, to fit minor changes. In this case you get two cameras, on both ends of the line, the heavy 810 and light 610. or heavy 7200 and light 3400. They use the same lens system, so there is no effect there.
I chose to go to a different system (m43) for even more weight reduction, so I took the hit of a new system being incompatible with my existing system. However, the next camera in the progression is in that same m43 system, and all the m43 lenses will work on that camera as well.
If you are already on the bottom of the series, such as with a D610, there is no option within the series, and you do have to change systems from FX to DX to get lighter.
OK, get a full frame camera and a 4/3 camera and APS-C camera and all the lenses .. and a cell phone camera
you've got it all covered ... until the next "progression"
www.flickr.com/photos/mmirrorless
CongratsX-T20 came today. Even after playing with it in the store I was still amazed at just how small it was when I unboxed it. I think it’s definitely going to be better to backpack with.
But I don’t have the lens here yet. It’s really hard to have a new camera to play with and no lens to mount on it lol.