mentos_007
The Freshmaker!
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2004
- Messages
- 9,324
- Reaction score
- 102
- Location
- Poland, Sz-n
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
well... now after all the changes in galleries here I've no idea where to post it. So feel free to move it, my dear Mod, wherever you want (I hope there's no Trash section...). So... I just need an advice: which one is better. The print of it (30x40 cm) will be sold for charity, but I have to choose which one is better:
here, the horse is "half transparent" so the flowers in the bg are sightly visible on its skin:
here, the horse is not transparent:
both shots (flowers and the horse) taken by me, of course, and then postprocessed in PS. I wanted to achieve something simmilar to double exposure on film... but, well... which one do you prefer??? and why?
cheers
here, the horse is "half transparent" so the flowers in the bg are sightly visible on its skin:
here, the horse is not transparent:
both shots (flowers and the horse) taken by me, of course, and then postprocessed in PS. I wanted to achieve something simmilar to double exposure on film... but, well... which one do you prefer??? and why?
cheers