Moving away, sorry I missed you

[rob91]

 

[ambriz001]

Here it goes again.....
Sorry these shots IMO aren't good, out of focus once again.

 

[plentygood]

I actually like the first one.

Here it goes again.....
Sorry these shots IMO aren't good, out of focus once again.

It's only going to start again if people keep egging it on.

 

[Sideburns]

poorly exposed, out of focus...and blurry in every direction, not just one...

I'm sorry, but I also like neither shot.

 

[a5i736]

Rob your photos are embarrassing, why do you wast time with taking photos when all they are is blurry. You are never gonna be a photographer if you practice like this.

 

[ilyfel]

Rob, Rob, Rob.. What to do w/ you...

 

[jwkwd]

Annnnd their off...........

 

[Roger]

maybe he's a really hot photog who's just stirring.....but why?

 

[jols]

 

[Alex_B]

come on people, what is the use of saying "I think they are our of focus." again and again. Everyone including the OP knows that they are!

I can see some interesting cropping here, which suits the idea of motion which I can find in both images.

Also, in both images, the lower half of the car is blocked by a concrete wall which makes sure that we cannot really see the characteristic parts of the cars. It is like if you show a person, but hide their face.

Face it guys, this was not an accident, but done on purpose. These "photographic mistakes" are so nicely done, that I can see clear intention here.

It does not mean I like them, it just means I can see a concept here.

 

[Alex_B]

I really think these images are more interesting now, since they contain more to discuss than the OPs earlier posts.

It is almost like a game .. "spot the main feature of the image besides the blurriness".

 

[plentygood]

Rob your photos are embarrassing, why do you wast time with taking photos when all they are is blurry. You are never gonna be a photographer if you practice like this.

He'll be one of the posthumously world famous artists.

But in all honestly guys, I'm with Alex. What's the point of pointing out the same thing in each thead. 1) I'm sure he's well aware. 2) It obviously doesn't phase him. 3) All you're doing is fanning the fire.

Like I said before, #1 is actually kind of interesting.

 

[Zach 428]

I see the theme, coming and going with the moving van and car heading in different directions. Both are cut off in half, adding some mystery. It would be a very interesting concept if it was done by someone who could have shot the images better.

 

[doobs]

I think I know what is going on! Ansel Adams is not really dead, and it is Rob! Adams got tired of being such a prestigious photographer and he wanted to have some fun, so he goes out and takes crappy pictures and posts them here!

 

[Universal Polymath]

maybe he's a really hot photog who's just stirring...

I believe this is so. "Really hot" may or may not be an overstatement, though.

...but why?

Attention?