Discussion in 'General Gallery' started by rob91, Nov 16, 2007.
Here it goes again.....
Sorry these shots IMO aren't good, out of focus once again.
I actually like the first one.
It's only going to start again if people keep egging it on.
poorly exposed, out of focus...and blurry in every direction, not just one...
I'm sorry, but I also like neither shot.
Rob your photos are embarrassing, why do you wast time with taking photos when all they are is blurry. You are never gonna be a photographer if you practice like this.
Rob, Rob, Rob.. What to do w/ you...
Annnnd their off...........
maybe he's a really hot photog who's just stirring.....but why?
come on people, what is the use of saying "I think they are our of focus." again and again. Everyone including the OP knows that they are!
I can see some interesting cropping here, which suits the idea of motion which I can find in both images.
Also, in both images, the lower half of the car is blocked by a concrete wall which makes sure that we cannot really see the characteristic parts of the cars. It is like if you show a person, but hide their face.
Face it guys, this was not an accident, but done on purpose. These "photographic mistakes" are so nicely done, that I can see clear intention here.
It does not mean I like them, it just means I can see a concept here.
I really think these images are more interesting now, since they contain more to discuss than the OPs earlier posts.
It is almost like a game .. "spot the main feature of the image besides the blurriness".
He'll be one of the posthumously world famous artists.
But in all honestly guys, I'm with Alex. What's the point of pointing out the same thing in each thead. 1) I'm sure he's well aware. 2) It obviously doesn't phase him. 3) All you're doing is fanning the fire.
Like I said before, #1 is actually kind of interesting.
Separate names with a comma.