dannylightning
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 2,322
- Reaction score
- 770
- Location
- Akron Ohio
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
610 is a great camera but it does not have the latest and greatest technology but most landscape photogrophers would be very happy with it., buy the 750 if you want better low light ( less noise at high ISO) and video performance, i cant remember why but the 750 is said to be one of the best nikon cameras for video.
if your not getting getting noisy photos from high iso the 610 or the 7200 may be a good choice if you want to pay a little less. if you are doing landscapes and you are using a tripod in low light situations, you can keep the iso at 100, use a longer shutter speed and you will not need to worry about noise from high iso. if you are hand holding in low light you cant use a slow shutter speed or you get blurred images and the iso will need to be cranked up which can cause noise.
personally i would pick the D7200 over the D610 but that is just me, i think its better for what i do with a camera, for land scapes the 610 is probably going to be a bit better. if i were going to buy a full frame i would get the D750, its seems its kind of made to be good at everything and has awesome low light performance.
i think your first step should be getting your self a good FX lens or two to use for your landscapes, and that will give you time to decide on what body you want to get if you are not sure on which one you want yet.
sigma and tamron both make a 17-50mm f/2.8 lens that people really seem to like allot and they are affordable compared to allot of lenses, they are very sharp and 2.8 is good in low light. its a constant 2.8 lens so no matter what focal length you are at you can use the lens at 2.8 if you want to. the f stop can be changed to f/8 or what ever you want, its not always at f/2.8 unless you want it to be. if you are concerned about low light that wold be a nice lens to get.
the nikon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 G ED VR lens is another lens that is somewhat affordable and people really seem to love. its very good for landscapes, you can start getting in to wild life shots of you can get somewhat close to the wild life and its also taking photos of people. my friend has one, i have seen many pics posted here taken with that lens and its outstanding for the money. there is a nikon, tamron and sigma 70-200 f/2.8 lenses as well but there a bit more money.
when buying a sigma lens if the lens is marked EX it is full frame. if marked DC it is a crop sensor lens. not sure how tamron labels full frame vs crop.. sigma makes some very nice lenses for less money compared to the big name brands, not all of their lenses are great but allot of them are. some of the newer ones are getting up there in price but allot of there new lenses are really nice.
if you ever get a d7200 or a full frame camera you can get some of the older nikon lenses that are excellent but do not have a built in focus motor. the 7200 and the full frames all have a built in focus motor in the body so you do not need a lens with a focus motor built in. you can get some excellent old nikon lenes used that do not have a built in focus motor between 50 and 400 bucks that some say are comparable to some of the really expensive nikon lenses of today as far as image quality goes.
I use ISO 100 probably 90% of the time with a long exposure on night shots... With my D5100 noise is definitely an issue specially since I am using a 55mm lens. However buying a new lens with a better aperture will definitely boost my chances... You may be onto something as far as lens... Just convinced my girlfriend to get me a lens for Christmas....so guess the lens will be free...ha ha... This will help me with making a hasty decision... Once again thanks for the input.... Which lens would you recommend? From tamron? Do you know the model?
using a 50mm lens has nothing to do with how much noise you get in a photo., ISO does, 100 iso your images should be noise free, at higher iso you get more noise no matter what the focal length of the lens.
no matter what the focal length your lens is or what f stop you use the lens at should not have anything to do with noise, the iso your using is what determines how much noise you have in the image., if you are using low iso and your still getting noise something is off somewhere. i could use a 18mm or a 1200mm lens and set the f stop to any number i want, set the iso at 100 and the image should be noise free.
as far as what lenses to get, there are lots of really good lenese out there, it all depends on the focal length you want, do you want a fast lens ( f/1.4,,,, f/1.8 or f/2.8) wold be considered fast lenses. and how much you want to spend on the lens all come into play with asking what kind of lens to get..
if you wold be ok with a 17-50mm f/2.8 lens these are very popular and image quality should be very comparable between the two.
here are a few links to lenses that will give really good image quality, (if you are good with your camera) but are not crazy expensive. i think the tamoron and sigmal are crop sensor lenses, i do not know that much bout the newer full frame lenses to really recommend them. the nikon 70-300 is a full frame lens and its is verry good.
unless you want to spend more money or you have a camera with a focus motor in the body which right now you do not, your probably not gonna get a better bang for the buck than these. but you would probably not want that tamron or sigma if you think you are going to go with a full frame camera body. if you do not mind manual focus only you could always get a lens without a focus motor but you have to focus the lens by hand if you go that rout.
Amazon.com : Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM FLD Large Aperture Standard Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera : Camera Lenses : Camera & Photo
Amazon.com : Tamron Auto Focus 17-50mm F/2.8 SP XR Di II VC (Vibration Compensation) Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras : Camera Lenses : Camera & Photo
if you want a second lens with more zoom this one is very good. allot of land scape photogrophers love the 70-200 or 70-300mm lenses since it will let them zoom in on things that are farther away if they are not looking to get a wide angle shot of the subject. or they can zoom in really tight on a close subject
Amazon.com : Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED IF AF-S VR Nikkor Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras : Camera Lenses : Camera & Photo
if you had the 17-50mm and the 70-300mm you would be set for almost any type of shooting you want to do and both of those lenses are capable of producing very good image quality.. here is a link for each lens showing photos that should be taken with each one.
the sigma 17-50 2.8 Search: sigma 17-50mm 2.8 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
the tamron 17-50 2.8 Search: tamron 17-50mm 2.8 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
the nikon 70-300 Search: nikon 70-300mm | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
here are some older full frame lenses to look at that do not have the focus motor but can produce great image quality if you are good with the camera.. but with your camera you would have to manually focus with these lenses by hand
since with full frame you get a more image in the frame they usually do not go as wide, you probably wont find a 18mm full frame lens unless you getting a ultra wide angle lens or something like that but that is more of a specialty type of lens.
Amazon.com : Nikon 35-70mm f/2.8D Auto Focus Zoom Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras (Discontinued by Manufacturer) : Camera Lenses : Camera & Photo
Amazon.com : Nikon 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5D Autofocus Zoom Nikkor Lens (Discontinued by Manufacturer) : Camera Lenses : Camera & Photo
psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=ox_sc_sfl_title_6&smid=A2GU9W96NTL362
Amazon.com : Nikon Nikkor 35-80mm f4-5.6D AF Zoom Lens : Camera Lenses : Camera & Photo
Last edited: