What's new

Nikon unveils 24.5MP D3x digital SLR

Another one of those worst kept secrets. :)

A couple of thoughts:

1 - 24.5MP means an increase in resolution, yes, but also in high ISO noise. It does make it a helluva studio protraiture camera, if slower than a standard D3/D700.

2 - ISO 50-6400. Wazzat? No more ISO 25,600? lol

3 - 8 grand US... wow, not many are going to be able to afford that. Let's see, if I wanted to pick that up here in Canada today, that would come out to... $11,500 just for the body! :gah:

4 - How does it stack up directly against it's #1 competitor, the Canon 1DS mkIII (pretty evenly I imagine, but there are always some differences).

This camera fills a very specific niche, one that Nikon was obliged into filling. Time will tell how it performs and sells. For me, this camera holds no interest at all. I am more than satisfied with 12 MP.
 
Indeed for most of us I doubt this camera would suit at all. How many people here have a need (I mean a NEED as in put bread on the table need) for more than ~12mpx.

For me it would be a step down from a D3.
 
Ya, I would never get a camera like that, the most id get is a 5D kinda camera :P
 
Even at 8 grand USD, I think the camera will still sell. The 1ds, 1dsMII, and now the 1dsMIII were all priced at around 8 grand when considered new. I still see enough of them on the used market to know that someone was buying those bodies at full price.

It is a one-two punch at Canon: the D3/D700 (in terms of ISO) and the D3x in terms of the megapixel rat race.
 
Oh it will sell for sure.. but to a very small tight market. The Canon equivalent is also 8G's and it sells.

I already have a couple terrabytes of RAW files. I cannot imagine playing with files double the size... lol
 
Oh awesome! That will be a 2009 buy for me - that way my D3 can be a backup. It seriously helps offset my tax burden to spend a good 8 grand (actually, more than that, but that will be one of the items...) and I can finally sell the D2x and the D200...!
 
I think I need to open a photography business. Not that I would have any clients, or make any sales, but my write-offs would be amazing... lol
 
Even at 8 grand USD, I think the camera will still sell. The 1ds, 1dsMII, and now the 1dsMIII were all priced at around 8 grand when considered new. I still see enough of them on the used market to know that someone was buying those bodies at full price.

It is a one-two punch at Canon: the D3/D700 (in terms of ISO) and the D3x in terms of the megapixel rat race.

Canon said they were already working on the DIGIC V processor before the 5D MKII was released to help improve speed and noise. The 1D MKIV and 1Ds MKIV should be here soon.
 
Yep and I can't wait to see what Canon do with them :)
Lets hope the AF is fixed ;)
 
A $3000 premium for more meaningless pixels with poorer noise and speed performance? Meh...

It's been two years since the D40, Nikon, you owe us a replacement (no, the D40x and D60 don't count).
 
Anything over 10Mp is a waste, unless you're making posters out of your pictures. And just try to email one of those pictures..LOL What will that be, about 20 Megabytes per picture.. Silly. It's like the 5 blade razor.. Why don't they just put 25 or so blades on them?
 
Its interesting to hear all the people saying that more MP is a waste in a photo - and yet I know several wildlife photographers who use the additional MP - since it allows them to crop the image down more to get a closer end effect.
For those opposed to cropping I can see how its not a gain, but to those willing to crop and image surly more MP is a good thing since you can crop more whilst still retaining the ability to make larger prints?
 
Last edited:

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom