I dunno what lens you used, but I don't care for the quality of the background blur. It's nauseating.
35mm 1.8. What's wrong with the quality? I know some lenses are better w/ bokeh than others. I'm curious to what you are thinking.
It looks so busy and overlappy, and jaggedy...it is visually disorienting to me. It's just not smooth and pleasing,
I suggest you take a look at "The Art of Photography" by Bruce Barnbaum. What is the story / point of the pictures? Had you not mentioned the tea party, I wouldn't have been able to figure them out.
I'm sorry but they look like rejects to me. No matter how many hours are spent Photoshoping them, they still don't have a story.
These photos are not "rejects" ... I already said these are promo photos for a tea party event I'm hosting and taking pictures for. I was thinking about combining them into a story board but I shouldn't have to because once I post the event anyone can figure out they are just shots of the potential setup. It's not like I took these to frame on my wall or something, so
some rules of photography can go out the window. I suggest you put that "The Art of Photography" book DOWN and open your mind a little...
I disagree with the ancientrookie, I totally got tea party from the first 2 images.
I love how you selectively toss information to suit your needs. From seeing your posts repeatedly, you would only benefit from reading as many books as you can. Maybe you would come here less looking for the quick fix of your problem du 'jour. Yoou provide a great example of this in the colorspace thread. You specifically asked to have it watered down so you can get what you need, and not have to fully understand it. You need a deeper understanding of what you are doing. You need to open your mind AND some books.
I do find it funny that here, you are willing to toss "rules", yet in another thread of someone elses work, you are quick to enforce them.
So which is it Sabrina? Do you even know?