What's new

RE: does this pic have any value?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is the 's' flow explained for blind people
Sshotexplainedformorons.jpg
 
it has not been cropped or altered in anyway, except for the line i just drew over it..

yes, there are a whole bunch of things your camera can do beyond just taking "in focus" shots... dont be so closed minded!
 
He can't be serious right guys? I mean no one is really like this in real life unless they aren't really all "here"
 
This is my last comment to you... get over yourself. Your inability to accept criticism will limit your ability to grow both as a person and a photographer. Your defensive and insulting nature turns people off. You are the first person here at TPF I will be putting on my Ignore list. I also suggest you refrain from offering photos for C&C, since you do not want to hear anything is wrong with your pictures.

Good day.
 
didnt anybody see the other blurry pic i put up? thru the window of the person walking with an umbrella? that wasnt mine but its a good example of how out of focus can look really good in its own respect.

Out of all the many out of focus shots I took, I got 2 that were good the first cat and this one:

Blurryush.jpg
 
There is a "S" in the picture. And the picture suppose to be blurry. But I still do not think it is a good picture. Of course, that is just my opinion.
 
Yes, but what is the meaning of the "S"? I didn't see it until the image was posted where it was outlined, but I don't understand the significance other than that it's a very mildly interesting (and perhaps unintentional) coincidence. That said, there are two kinds of blurriness in this photo - first, it's simply a bit out of focus. The camera was trying to focus on something either in front of or behind the cat, not the cat's fur or the "S" pattern. Second, there is a motion blur from the cat's movements, and I think this might be responsible for the pattern you see in the fur. While motion blur is often created intentionally to enhance photographs, I can't recall seeing a photograph that is focused improperly and still looks good.

The motion blur enhances or even creates the "S" pattern, but the blur from being out of focus simply harms the photo and makes the pattern harder to discern. The out-of-focus blur does not help this picture at all. By that logic, you could go into Photoshop and blur the whole thing and it should look infinitely better. This photograph would look better (both in terms of technical and artistic aspects) and the pattern would be easier to see if it was in focus. Anyway, that's really all I have to say about this matter.
 
I think you guys are taking this all way to seriously... so out of focus shots are not allowed? and the whole branch of 'out of focus photography' is worthless? You think am being insulting, you didnt read any of the first thread or much of this one.... the only critizism im getting is that its out of focus, no ****?
 
I want to see somebody elses burry art shots... please
 
it's not bad because it's "OUT OF FOCUS" it's that it looks like i handed my 4 year old niece the camera and she went on her merry way taking everything on 1/4 or 1/8 shutter, then studied the picture hard to find something about it that's different, hell i could spell my username out in that "S" cat photo if i wanted, but that doesn't make it "have value" either does it?

if you "interpret" the photo as something that's amazing and has huge value, print that thing up big and hang it on your ceiling, but don't go and post on a PUBLIC forum where EVERYONE is entitled to their OWN opinion and not expect to be ridiculed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom