What's new

Sarah

Josh66

Been spending a lot of time on here!
Joined
Oct 31, 2007
Messages
14,593
Reaction score
1,239
Location
Cedar Hill, Texas
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
Pretty sure I haven't posted this, but if I have it was a long time ago...


2012070807 by J E, on Flickr

Ektar 100 (exposed at ISO 50) developed by me.
 
Wow, this photo is WAY over-exposed for me. I mean this as nice as possible, but it hurts my eyes to look at this photo. It is just way too bright.
 
Really?

I have to ask ... is your monitor calibrated...? Because mine is and it looks fine to me... No offense or anything, I'm just not getting the 'way overexposed' thing...
 
Well, I guess I could be due for recalibration, but typically (in my experience, on my monitor) when I need to recalibrate it's mostly the colors that are off, not the brightness.

I guess I'll wait for another opinion, lol. I'll probably recalibrate anyway though, because I probably am due for it...
 
looks really bright (& red) to me.

$sarahhisto.webp
 
I just recalibrated - the brightness looks more or less the same to me... (My monitor does look a lot more cool now (as far as temp goes), but I didn't really notice a change in brightness - it may take my eyes a while to get used to the new profile...)

It is a little magenta (I knew that before I recalibrated), but as far as brightness goes, I didn't think it was over the top or anything... You guys have me worried now, lol!


How do these look (as far as color & brightness are concerned)?

2012070803 by J E, on Flickr


2012123139 by J E, on Flickr


edit
The colors look 'right' to me - they match my prints, anyway.
 
I agree the girl is exposed well but she IS red. It could very well be a sunburn though ;)
 
The grass looks 'right' to me, so I'm assuming the redness is a combination of the film characteristics, the light at the time of shooting, and maybe a tiny bit of sunburn.
 
Parker219 said:
Wow, this photo is WAY over-exposed for me. I mean this as nice as possible, but it hurts my eyes to look at this photo. It is just way too bright.

I think what Parker means is something like this:


$image-539827863.webp
 
I like my version better, lol.

The skin tones look more-or-less natural, but there's just something about it that I don't like. It's not 'bad', just not my style I guess.
 
The bright is fine. It look like bright sun should look, and projects that feeling quite well.

Her skin looks blotchy to me, with regions of red/magenta icky, almost like a rash on her cheeks and above her eyebrows. It could be that's what she really looks like, but it ain't flattering! She looks like a bit of a handful, from the expression -- I like that part quite a bit.
 
She just looks sunburned to me. The background is bright, but not blindingly overexposed as others let on. Bright > dull and dreary IMO. lol But yeah, shes crispy red.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom