Sorry Formatted I just realised my reply comes off as disrepectful.
What I'm looking for would more controled test enviroments. I've played around with display models in a local shop. I thought the 7d 70-200 f2.8 usm II combo was able to hit the focus on the single center point faster and with less hunting than the 300s 70-200 f2.8 vrII combo. I'm really looking for testing on moving subjects which I couldn't do in the store.
Using that type of testing procedure, one,single centrally-located AF point, Canon bodies of various models have established a pretty good track record of fast focus acquisition. But that is NOT the way to use a modern Nikon to its full advantage; Nikon has 3-D RGB Color Matrix light metering AND focusing...ignoring 50 out of 51 AF points on a modern Nikon is not the best way to maximize the camera's AF performance. There's a fundamental difference between an older, color-blind Canon camera that cannot discern color, and the last 30 or so Nikon models, each of which have 405 to 1,0005 to 2,016 Red Green Blue color-sensing pixels to 1) measure the color of the first selected AF point or group of points that the shooter aquires focus on and 2) to be able to follow that subject as it moves across the frame, or up and down the field of play/flight/racing.
I'll simplify this: Canon has established excellent one-shot focus acquisition using one,single AF point. Nikon has established excellent one-shot focus acquisition using a small group of AF points (3,9,11,21 points, depending on the particular body), and Nikon has developed superior Autofocus TRACKING over long sequences--when used by people who UNDERSTAND how the Nikon AF systems are DESIGNED TO BE USED. So basically, that means Canon shooters who do not have a clue of how to employ a multi-area AF system often futz up Nikon "tests", as do ignorant Nikon users whose experience and constant suggestion is "use the center AF point only". The web is filled with a number of brief side-by-side comparisons by people with an agenda, OR people who just simply have absolutely no IDEA of how advanced AF systems have become. It's almost as if these shooters, most of them older and more-experienced, simply have no fricking idea of how much better an AF system can work when it is operated the way it was designed to be operated. These are the same people that will trust a flash meter reading implicitly, but are afraid of learning how to work a modern, AF d-slr that uses modern, AF lenses.