Sydney Hot Babes Street Photography

[blackrose89]

I'd like you see take a picture of a dragonfly...They should be easy subject, they love it when you get up close!

Even then you gotta be careful and respectful. With nature as well. Even squirrels will give you that "WTF" look when their personal space is invadedDSCN0453 by blackrose1981, on Flickr

 

[FinancialWar]

So you are calling most people on this forum Pu$$ies? Wow.. you are a cocky little one, aren't you? I don't call that balls.. I call that socially retarded!

So you're calling Bruce Gilden and Eric Kim socially retarded??

You aren't Bruce Gilden or Eric Kim.. you are some jerk with a crappy Point and Shoot that seems to like to bother people...

same can be said to 99% of street photographers out there. Plus you know nothing about camera it seems. S95 is top of the line P&S with manual control and RAW imaging....

 

[ghache]

So you're calling Bruce Gilden and Eric Kim socially retarded??

You aren't Bruce Gilden or Eric Kim.. you are some jerk with a crappy Point and Shoot that seems to like to bother people...

same can be said to 99% of street photographers out there. Plus you know nothing about camera it seems. S95 is top of the line P&S with manual control and RAW imaging....

LOL, REALLLLLLLY?

 

[blackrose89]

So you're calling Bruce Gilden and Eric Kim socially retarded??

You aren't Bruce Gilden or Eric Kim.. you are some jerk with a crappy Point and Shoot that seems to like to bother people...

same can be said to 99% of street photographers out there. Plus you know nothing about camera it seems. S95 is top of the line P&S with manual control and RAW imaging....

You're right. Charlie is Sh!t with a camera.

 

[Judobreaker]

You aren't Bruce Gilden or Eric Kim.. you are some jerk with a crappy Point and Shoot that seems to like to bother people...

same can be said to 99% of street photographers out there. Plus you know nothing about camera it seems. S95 is top of the line P&S with manual control and RAW imaging....

You're right. Charlie is Sh!t with a camera.

Aren't we all? ^^

 

[blackrose89]

same can be said to 99% of street photographers out there. Plus you know nothing about camera it seems. S95 is top of the line P&S with manual control and RAW imaging....

You're right. Charlie is Sh!t with a camera.

Aren't we all? ^^

True.

 

[FinancialWar]

there's a picture of an inanimate object I took in a graveyard... Crap, I even bother people when they are dead...


IMG_1249 by 日本光学, on Flickr

 

[FinancialWar]

After watching this video, I am inspired to quite my full time job. And do street photography full time.

[youtube][/youtube]

 

[IByte]

same can be said to 99% of street photographers out there. Plus you know nothing about camera it seems. S95 is top of the line P&S with manual control and RAW imaging....

LOL, dude seriously having a hissy fit on a public forum? Are you not realizing that you are the reason why "civilians" distrust photographers in the first place? I bet you are mad because you were expecting a different response, and now you are getting chewed for a basic privilige that many photographers value. Are you the reincarnation of thephotoguy? Seriously take your unwanted whining and crying to Facebook.

If I saw you pointing the camera at me, I would have given you the best shot of the moon. Grow up or get the out of heck here.

Sorry folks just annoyed that you can't be civil and give good constructive advice.....getting a beer, who wants one?

 

[cgipson1]

So you're calling Bruce Gilden and Eric Kim socially retarded??

You aren't Bruce Gilden or Eric Kim.. you are some jerk with a crappy Point and Shoot that seems to like to bother people...

same can be said to 99% of street photographers out there. Plus you know nothing about camera it seems. S95 is top of the line P&S with manual control and RAW imaging....

Yea.. you are right.. I have only been doing this for a little while.. and really know nothing at all!

btw.. you are what.. maybe 16 or so? lol!

 

[kundalini]

... Crap, I even bother people when they are dead...

.... plus overexposing the distant background and underexposing the subject.

Were you trying to have a laugh?

Hardee Har

 

[mjhoward]

This is so ironic, because like this squirrel, the OP was also trying to get a nut!

 

[kundalini]

This is so ironic, because like this squirrel, the OP was also trying to get a nut!

It has been scientifically proven that if you forced feed a baby squirrel 700 cannabis cigarettes a day, the laws of nature seem to wane, whereas the subject squirrel will tend to play with his nuts rather than store them.



Credit to Chevy Chase on a SNL Weekend Update skit

 

[shortpants]

Agreed, most people on this forum seem to one a Kittywithacamera. They don't have the balls to do what I did lol.

Taking pictures of trees, birds, dog, wall, rock... takes so courage. Any one do that.

So you are calling most people on this forum Pu$$ies? Wow.. you are a cocky little one, aren't you? I don't call that balls.. I call that socially retarded!

So you're calling Bruce Gilden and Eric Kim socially retarded?? Just because you don't have the balls to do street photography 3 feet from someone's face. Socially retarded? why would I be socially acceptable to someone I don't even know?? If I do this in front of or to my workmates, families or friends that would be socially retarded. To someone I don't know and will never likely to meet again, I don't give a care.

I am breaking social boundaries yeah sure, to get the shot I want, as long as I am within the legal boundary I am cool with that.

*yawn* yeah balls of steel. Creepy guys never get in girls faces. You're the first. Ever.

 

[blackrose89]

OP all sarcasm and insulting aside let me ask you a serious question and hopefully you can give me a real answer.

How exactly do you think your photos are better benefited with your approach as opposed to what others do who try to be discreet and respectful? Looking through your photostream, when you take the, let's call it the "bold" approach I see a lot of "WTF" and unhappy faces staring at you. Is this what you are trying to accomplish? You insist that your approach is better. So can you answer in what way?